Santos v. Equifax Information Services, LLC
Raymunda Santos |
Equifax Information Services, LLC |
2:2021cv01083 |
June 8, 2021 |
US District Court for the District of Nevada |
Nancy J Koppe |
James C Mahan |
Consumer Credit |
15 U.S.C. ยง 1681 |
Both |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on September 3, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 8 CERTIFICATE of Interested Parties by Equifax Information Services, LLC that identifies all parties that have an interest in the outcome of this case. Corporate Parent Equifax Inc. for Equifax Information Services, LLC added. (Thompson, Jeremy) |
Filing 7 ANSWER to #1 Complaint, with Jury Demand filed by Equifax Information Services, LLC. Discovery Plan/Scheduling Order due by 9/13/2021. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Cert of Interested Parties)(Thompson, Jeremy) NOTICE of Certificate of Interested Parties requirement: Under Local Rule 7.1-1, a party must immediately file its disclosure statement with its first appearance, pleading, petition, motion, response, or other request addressed to the court. |
Filing 6 ORDER granting #5 Stipulation to Extend Time Re: #1 Complaint, Equifax Information Services, LLC answer due 8/2/2021. Signed by Magistrate Judge Nancy J. Koppe on 7/6/2021. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - HAM) |
Filing 5 Joint STIPULATION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME (First Request) Joint Stipulation for Extension of Time for Defendant Equifax Information Services LLC to File Answer re #1 Complaint, by Defendant Equifax Information Services, LLC. (Thompson, Jeremy) |
Filing 4 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Raymunda Santos re #3 Summons Issued, #1 Complaint,. Equifax Information Services, LLC served on 6/10/2021. (Krieger, David) |
Filing 3 Summons Issued as to Equifax Information Services, LLC re #1 Complaint (HAM) |
Filing 2 CERTIFICATE of Interested Parties by Raymunda Santos. There are no known interested parties other than those participating in the case (Krieger, David) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants (Filing fee $402 receipt number 0978-6514875) by Raymunda Santos. Proof of service due by 9/6/2021. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Summons Equifax) (Krieger, David) NOTICE of Certificate of Interested Parties requirement: Under Local Rule 7.1-1, a party must immediately file its disclosure statement with its first appearance, pleading, petition, motion, response, or other request addressed to the court. |
Case randomly assigned to Judge James C. Mahan and Magistrate Judge Nancy J. Koppe. (HAM) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Nevada District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Santos v. Equifax Information Services, LLC | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: Equifax Information Services, LLC | |
Represented By: | Jeremy J. Thompson |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: Raymunda Santos | |
Represented By: | David H. Krieger |
Represented By: | Shawn Wayne Miller |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.