Foster v. Williams et al
Tarron Foster |
State of Nevada, Attorney General State of Nevada and Williams |
2:2021cv01104 |
June 10, 2021 |
US District Court for the District of Nevada |
Jennifer A Dorsey |
Brenda Weksler |
Habeas Corpus (General) |
28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on June 21, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 4 JUDGMENT in favor of Attorney General State of Nevada, State of Nevada, Williams against Tarron Foster. Signed by Clerk of Court Debra K. Kempi on 6/21/2021. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - HAM) |
Filing 3 ORDER denying #1 Motion/Application for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis. This action is DISMISSED without prejudice. Signed by Judge Jennifer A. Dorsey on 6/18/2021. (Attachments: #1 IFP Inmate form/instructions - Copy attached for distribution to P via HDSP law library )(Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - HAM) |
Filing 2 NOTICE from USDC advising case against Williams, et al., has been received and assigned case number 2:21-cv-01104-JAD-BNW. (DRS) |
Filing 1 MOTION/APPLICATION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Plaintiff Tarron Foster. (Attachments: #1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus 28 USC 2254, #2 Motion for Appointment of Counsel) (DRS) |
Case randomly assigned to Judge Jennifer A. Dorsey and Magistrate Judge Brenda Weksler. (HAM) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Nevada District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.