Rosenberg v. Green Planet Legacy 68, LLC et al
Max Rosenberg |
Green Planet Legacy 68, LLC, Joe Juarez and John Singh |
2:2021cv01124 |
June 14, 2021 |
US District Court for the District of Nevada |
Nancy J Koppe |
James C Mahan |
Contract: Other |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on January 17, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 3 Summons Issued as to Green Planet Legacy 68, LLC, Joe Juarez, John Singh re #1 Complaint. (DRS) |
Filing 2 CERTIFICATE of Interested Parties by Max Rosenberg that identifies all parties that have an interest in the outcome of this case. Other Affiliate Jason Mathew, Other Affiliate Jennifer Juarez, Other Affiliate Veronica Singh for Max Rosenberg added. (Bach, Jason) |
Case randomly assigned to Judge James C. Mahan and Magistrate Judge Nancy J. Koppe. (DRS) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants (Filing fee $402 receipt number 0978-6523295) by Max Rosenberg. Proof of service due by 9/12/2021. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Summons for Green Planet Legacy 68, LLC, #3 Summons for Joe Juarez, #4 Summons for John Singh) (Bach, Jason) NOTICE of Certificate of Interested Parties requirement: Under Local Rule 7.1-1, a party must immediately file its disclosure statement with its first appearance, pleading, petition, motion, response, or other request addressed to the court. |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Nevada District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.