Martinez v. Saul
| Terry Lee Martinez |
| Andrew Saul |
| 2:2021cv01129 |
| June 15, 2021 |
| US District Court for the District of Nevada |
| Nancy J Koppe |
| Social Security: SSID Tit. XVI |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 205 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on October 20, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 11 NOTICE of Appearance by attorney Allison Cheung on behalf of Defendant Andrew Saul. (Cheung, Allison) |
| Filing 10 Certified Receipt Returned 7018 3090 0001 1133 1552 re #6 Summons Issued. (DRS) (DRS). |
| Filing 9 SUMMONS Returned Executed re #6 Summons Issued as to USA. Andrew Saul served on 6/22/2021. (JQC) |
| Filing 8 NOTICE of Appearance by attorney Sarah Wyeth McAdam on behalf of Defendant Andrew Saul. (McAdam, Sarah) |
| Filing 7 Certified Receipts 7018 3090 0001 1133 1545 and 7018 3090 0001 1133 1552 re #6 Summons Issued as to USA. (DRS) |
| Filing 6 SUMMONS Issued as to Andrew Saul, U.S. Attorney and U.S. Attorney General. (Sent with #4 and #5 to USMS for physical service and by certified mail - DRS) (Main Document 6 replaced on 6/16/2021) (DRS). |
| Filing 5 COMPLAINT against Andrew Saul by Terry Lee Martinez. (DRS) |
Filing 4
ORDER granting #1 Motion/Application for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis. IT IS ORDERED that the Clerk of Court shall file the [1-1] Complaint. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk of Court shall serve the Commissioner of the Social Security Administration by sending a copy of the summons and Complaint by certified mail. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk of Court shall issue summons to the United States Attorney for the District of Nevada and deliver the summons and Complaint to the U.S. Marshal for service. Signed by Magistrate Judge Nancy J. Koppe on 6/16/2021. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - DRS)
|
| Filing 3 NOTICE to Clerk of Court Regarding Assignment of Social Security Cases. (Document restricted under General Order 2019-08.) (AF) |
| Case randomly assigned to Magistrate Judge Nancy J. Koppe. (AF) |
| Filing 2 CERTIFICATE of Interested Parties by Terry Lee Martinez. There are no known interested parties other than those participating in the case (Kalagian, Marc) |
| Filing 1 MOTION/APPLICATION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Plaintiff Terry Lee Martinez. (Attachments: #1 Complaint, #2 Civil Cover Sheet, #3 Summons)(Kalagian, Marc) Modified on 6/16/2021 (AF). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Nevada District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Martinez v. Saul | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Andrew Saul | |
| Represented By: | Allison Cheung |
| Represented By: | Sarah Wyeth McAdam |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Terry Lee Martinez | |
| Represented By: | Marc V Kalagian |
| Represented By: | Gerald Morris Welt |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
