Garcia v. Hutchings et al
Petitioner: Ramon Jacobo Garcia
Respondent: William Hutchings and Attorney General State of Nevada
Case Number: 2:2021cv01222
Filed: June 29, 2021
Court: US District Court for the District of Nevada
Presiding Judge: Jennifer A Dorsey
Referring Judge: Brenda Weksler
Nature of Suit: Habeas Corpus (General)
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on August 3, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
August 3, 2021 Filing 9 MEMORANDUM of USCA, Ninth Circuit, as to #8 Notice of Appeal filed by Ramon Jacobo Garcia. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - HAM)
August 2, 2021 Filing 8 NOTICE OF APPEAL as to #3 Order and #7 Judgment by Petitioner Ramon Jacobo Garcia. No IFP or filing fee paid. E-mail notice (NEF) sent to the US Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. (DRS) Modified link on 8/2/2021 (DKJ).
June 30, 2021 Filing 7 CLERK'S JUDGMENT this action is dismissed with prejudice. A certificate of appealability is denied. Signed by Clerk of Court Debra K. Kempi on 6/30/2021. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - MR)
June 30, 2021 Filing 6 MOTION for Appointment of Counsel by Ramon Jacobo Garcia. (DENIED pursuant to #3 Order.) (MR)
June 30, 2021 Filing 5 Second APPLICATION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Ramon Jacobo Garcia. (DENIED pursuant to #3 Order.) (MR)
June 30, 2021 Filing 4 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus by Ramon Jacobo Garcia. (MR)
June 30, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 3 ORDER. IT IS ORDERED that #1 Garcia's motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis is GRANTED.IT IS FURTHER ORDERED #1 -1 the petition for writ of habeas corpus is DISMISSED with prejudice and without leave to amend, and a certificate of appealability is denied.IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Garcia's #1 -2 second motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis and #1 -3 motion for appointment of counsel are DENIED as moot. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk of Court is directed to FILE the petition and accompanying motions, ENTER JUDGMENT, and CLOSE THIS CASE. Signed by Judge Jennifer A. Dorsey on 6/30/2021. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - MR)
June 29, 2021 Filing 2 ADVISORY LETTER to litigant. (DRS)
June 29, 2021 Filing 1 MOTION/APPLICATION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Petitioner Ramon Jacobo Garcia. (Attachments: #1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus 28 USC 2254, #2 Second IFP motion, #3 Motion for Counsel) (DRS)
June 29, 2021 Case randomly assigned to Judge Jennifer A. Dorsey and Magistrate Judge Brenda Weksler. (DRS)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Nevada District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Garcia v. Hutchings et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: Ramon Jacobo Garcia
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: William Hutchings
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: Attorney General State of Nevada
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?