Baker v. The Vons Companies, Inc. et al
| Alyssa Baker |
| The Vons Companies, Inc. doing business as Vons 1963 and Safeway Inc. doing business as Vons |
| 2:2021cv01278 |
| July 6, 2021 |
| US District Court for the District of Nevada |
| Cam Ferenbach |
| Gloria M Navarro |
| P.I.: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on August 25, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 9
ORDER granting #8 Stipulation to Remand. Signed by Judge Gloria M. Navarro on 8/25/2021. Case terminated. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - certified copy of docket and order mailed to state court - HAM)
|
|
Filing 8
STIPULATION and ORDER TO REMAND re 5 Minute Order,,, by Defendant The Vons Companies, Inc.. (Burden, Jack)
|
| Filing 7 Joint STATUS REPORT by Plaintiff Alyssa Baker. (Banda, Sarah) |
| Filing 6 CERTIFICATE of Interested Parties by Alyssa Baker. There are no known interested parties other than those participating in the case (Banda, Sarah) |
| Filing 5 MINUTE ORDER IN CHAMBERS of the Honorable Judge Gloria M. Navarro on 7/13/2021. IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Defendants The Vons Companies, Inc. et al ("Defendants") show cause as to why the Court should not remand this action to Eighth Judicial District Court for failure to satisfy the diversity jurisdiction requirements set forth in 28 U.S.C. 1332. Specifically, Defendants must show that the amount in controversy exceeds $75,000.00. Defendants shall have until Friday, August 13, 2021 to file a brief, not to exceed ten pages, demonstrating that the Court has subject matter jurisdiction over this action. Failure to comply with this Order will result in this case being remanded to Eighth Judicial District Court.(Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - NY) |
| Filing 4 CERTIFICATE of Interested Parties by The Vons Companies, Inc. that identifies all parties that have an interest in the outcome of this case. Corporate Parent The Vons Companies, Inc., Other Affiliate Safeway, Inc., Other Affiliate Albertson's LLC for The Vons Companies, Inc. added. (Burden, Jack) |
| Filing 3 MINUTE ORDER IN CHAMBERS of the Honorable Judge Gloria M. Navarro on 7/6/2021. Statement regarding removed action is due by 7/21/2021. Joint Status Report regarding removed action is due by 8/5/2021. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - HAM) |
| Filing 2 STANDING ORDER. This case has been assigned to the Honorable Judge Gloria M. Navarro. Judge Navarro's Chambers Practices, which are posted on the U.S. District Court, District of Nevada public website, may also be accessed directly via this hyperlink #www.nvd.uscourts.gov. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - HAM) |
| Filing 1 PETITION FOR REMOVAL from Eighth Judicial District, Case Number A-21-835167-C, (Filing fee $ 402 receipt number 0978-6546238) by Safeway Inc., The Vons Companies, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Declaration Civil cover Sheet, #2 Index Index of Exhibits, #3 Exhibit A, #4 Exhibit B, #5 Exhibit C, #6 Exhibit D, #7 Exhibit E, #8 Exhibit F) (Burden, Jack) NOTICE of Certificate of Interested Parties requirement: Under Local Rule 7.1-1, a party must immediately file its disclosure statement with its first appearance, pleading, petition, motion, response, or other request addressed to the court. |
| Case randomly assigned to Judge Gloria M. Navarro and Magistrate Judge Cam Ferenbach. (HAM) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Nevada District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
