Howard v. Nevada Department of Corrections et al
| Cedric Howard |
| Nevada Department of Corrections, William Hutchings, G. Raymond, Perico, Sparbech and Regis |
| 2:2021cv01282 |
| July 6, 2021 |
| US District Court for the District of Nevada |
| Daniel J Albregts |
| Richard F Boulware |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on February 9, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 4 RECEIPT of Payment: $ 402.00, receipt number NVLAS076613 (YAW) |
Filing 3
ORDER. IT IS ORDERED that the Clerk of the Court will send Plaintiff the approved form application/information to proceed in forma pauperis by an inmate. IFP/Payment of filing fees due 9/7/2021. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk of the Court will retain the complaint (ECF No. #1 -1) but will not file it at this time. Signed by Magistrate Judge Daniel J. Albregts on 7/8/2021. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - IFP inmate form/instructions mailed to P - HAM)
|
| Filing 2 ADVISORY LETTER to litigant. (HAM) |
| Filing 1 RECEIPT of Initiating Documents by Court on behalf of Plaintiff. No Application to Proceed IFP or Filing Fee received. (Attachments: #1 Complaint, #2 Summons, #3 Subpoena) (HAM) |
| Case randomly assigned to Judge Richard F. Boulware, II and Magistrate Judge Daniel J. Albregts. (HAM) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Nevada District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
