Walker v. Social Security Administation et al
| Annette D. Walker |
| Social Security Administation, HUD/Southern Nevada Regional Housing Authority State of Nevada, A. Ford, Wells Fargo Bank, Siegel Suites Boulder 3, Housing Urban Development, State of Nevada Attorney General, A Fudge, SNRHA/SNVRHA and State of Georgia |
| 2:2021cv01352 |
| July 16, 2021 |
| US District Court for the District of Nevada |
| Richard F Boulware |
| Brenda Weksler |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on September 8, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 7
ORDER. IT IS ORDERED that #5 the amended complaint is DISMISSED without prejudice for failure to state a claim upon which relief can be granted, with leave to amend. Amended Complaint deadline: 10/8/2021. Signed by Magistrate Judge Brenda Weksler on 9/8/2021. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - JQC)
|
| Filing 6 MINUTE ORDER IN CHAMBERS of the Honorable Magistrate Judge Brenda Weksler on 8/20/2021. Plaintiff filed what appears to be a motion for pro bono assistance, though the motion does not request counsel or explain why counsel is needed. Plaintiff filed an amended complaint [ECF No. #5 ) on 8/19/2021 that the Court still must screen. Accordingly, there is no operative complaint in this case, and any request for counsel (to the extent this is what Plaintiff is requesting) is premature. As such, IT IS ORDERED that ECF No. #4 is DENIED without prejudice. (no image attached) (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - Amari, Radia) |
| Filing 5 AMENDED COMPLAINT against A Fudge, Housing Urban Development, SNRHA/SNVRHA, Social Security Administation, State of Georgia, State of Nevada Attorney General, Wells Fargo Bank by Annette D. Walker. Adds A. Fudge and State of Georgia and removes Siegal Suites. (Attachments: #1 Exhibits) (Document restricted to case participants due to personal identifiers - DRS) Modified file date on 8/20/2021 (DRS). |
| Filing 4 MOTION re Pro Bono Program by Plaintiff Annette D. Walker. Responses due by 8/31/2021. (YAW) |
| Filing 3 COMPLAINT against All Defendants by Annette D. Walker. Proof of service due by 10/18/2021. (YAW) |
|
Filing 2
SCREENING ORDER. ORDER Granting #1 Motion/Application for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis. Plaintiff will not be required to pay the filing fee in this action. Plaintiff is permitted to maintain this action to conclusion without the necessity of prepayment of any additional fees or costs or the giving of a security for fees or costs. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk of the Court must file Plaintiff's complaint (ECF No. #1 -1). IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the complaint (ECF No. #1 -1) is DISMISSED without prejudice for failure to state a claim upon which relief can be granted, with leave to amend. Amended Complaint deadline: 8/19/2021. See Order for additional information. Signed by Magistrate Judge Brenda Weksler on 7/20/2021. (copy of complaint sent to P)(Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - cc: copy of Order to Finance Dept. YAW)
|
| Filing 1 MOTION/APPLICATION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Plaintiff Annette D. Walker. (Attachments: #1 Complaint, #2 Notice of Lawsuit and Request to Waive Service of Summons) (YAW) |
| Case randomly assigned to Judge Richard F. Boulware, II and Magistrate Judge Brenda Weksler. (MR) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Nevada District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
