Soto v. Trans Union LLC
| Mary J Soto |
| Trans Union LLC |
| 2:2021cv01389 |
| July 26, 2021 |
| US District Court for the District of Nevada |
| Jennifer A Dorsey |
| Elayna J Youchah |
| Consumer Credit |
| 15 U.S.C. ยง 1681 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on March 1, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 9 ANSWER to #1 Complaint, filed by Trans Union LLC. Discovery Plan/Scheduling Order due by 11/1/2021.(Bergh, Jennifer) NOTICE of Certificate of Interested Parties requirement: Under Local Rule 7.1-1, a party must immediately file its disclosure statement with its first appearance, pleading, petition, motion, response, or other request addressed to the court. |
Filing 8
ORDER granting #5 Motion to Extend Time Re: #1 Complaint. Trans Union LLC answer due 9/17/2021. Signed by Magistrate Judge Elayna J. Youchah on 8/18/2021. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - DRS)
|
| Filing 7 CERTIFICATE of Interested Parties by Trans Union LLC that identifies all parties that have an interest in the outcome of this case. Corporate Parent TransUnion, Corporate Parent TransUnion Intermediate Holding, Inc., Other Affiliate T. Rowe Price Group, Inc. for Trans Union LLC added. (Bergh, Jennifer) |
| Filing 6 NOTICE of Appearance by attorney Jennifer Rebecca Bergh on behalf of Defendant Trans Union LLC. (Bergh, Jennifer) |
| Filing 5 Joint MOTION to Extend Time (First Request) to File an Answer or Otherwise Respond re #1 Complaint, by Defendant Trans Union LLC. (Bergh, Jennifer) |
| Filing 4 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Mary J Soto re #3 Summons Issued. Trans Union LLC served on 7/28/2021. (Gliner, Mitchell) |
| Filing 3 Summons Issued as to Trans Union LLC. (DRS) |
| Filing 2 CERTIFICATE of Interested Parties by Mary J Soto. There are no known interested parties other than those participating in the case (Gliner, Mitchell) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Trans Union LLC (Filing fee $402 receipt number 0978-6570523) by Mary J Soto. Proof of service due by 10/24/2021. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Summons) (Gliner, Mitchell) NOTICE of Certificate of Interested Parties requirement: Under Local Rule 7.1-1, a party must immediately file its disclosure statement with its first appearance, pleading, petition, motion, response, or other request addressed to the court. |
| Case randomly assigned to Judge Jennifer A. Dorsey and Magistrate Judge Elayna J. Youchah. (DRS) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Nevada District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Soto v. Trans Union LLC | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Mary J Soto | |
| Represented By: | Mitchell D Gliner |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Trans Union LLC | |
| Represented By: | Jennifer Rebecca Bergh |
| Represented By: | Kurt R. Bonds |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
