Garibaldi v. Boyd Gaming Corporation
| Federico Garibaldi |
| Boyd Gaming Corporation |
| 2:2021cv01444 |
| August 3, 2021 |
| US District Court for the District of Nevada |
| Daniel J Albregts |
| Gloria M Navarro |
| Civil Rights: Americans with Disabilities - Employment |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on January 18, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 13 NOTICE PURSUANT TO LOCAL RULE IB 2-2: In accordance with 28 USC 636(c) and FRCP 73, the parties in this action are provided with a link to the "AO 85 Notice of Availability, Consent, and Order of Reference - Exercise of Jurisdiction by a U.S. Magistrate Judge" form on the Court's website - #www.nvd.uscourts.gov. AO 85 Consent forms should NOT be electronically filed. Upon consent of all parties, counsel are advised to manually file the form with the Clerk's Office. (A copy of form AO 85 has been mailed to parties not receiving electronic service.) (no image attached) (DRS) |
Filing 12
ORDER granting #10 Stipulated Discovery Plan and Scheduling Order. Discovery due by 2/28/2022. Motions due by 3/30/2022. Proposed Joint Pretrial Order due by 4/29/2022. Signed by Magistrate Judge Daniel J. Albregts on 9/30/2021. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - DRS)
|
| Filing 11 NOTICE of Docket Correction to #10 filed by attorney Jill Garcia. The Court has corrected and changed the event from Stipulation to Stipulated Discovery Plan and Scheduling Order. No further action is required at this time. Do not refile document. (no image attached) (SLD) |
| Filing 10 Stipulated Discovery Plan and Scheduling Order, STIPULATION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME (First Request) re Discovery Plan and Scheduling Order Submitted in Compliance with LR 26-1(b) by Plaintiff Federico Garibaldi. (Garcia, Jill) Modified event on 9/28/2021 (SLD). |
|
Filing 9
ORDER Setting Early Neutral Evaluation session. Pre-ENE Telephonic Conference is set for 12/9/2021 at 03:00 PM Magistrate Judge Brenda Weksler. Early Neutral Evaluation set for 12/10/2021 at 09:00 AM via Videoconference before Magistrate Judge Brenda Weksler. Written evaluation must be submitted electronically to judicial clerk Radia Amari at radia_amari@nvd.uscourts.gov, by 4:00 p.m. on 12/3/2021. Signed by Magistrate Judge Brenda Weksler on 8/31/2021. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - DRS)
|
| Filing 8 CERTIFICATE of Interested Parties by Boyd Gaming Corporation. There are no known interested parties other than those participating in the case (Paxton, Kaitlin) |
| Filing 7 ANSWER to Complaint filed by Boyd Gaming Corporation. Discovery Plan/Scheduling Order due by 10/14/2021.(Sarafina, Jen) NOTICE of Certificate of Interested Parties requirement: Under Local Rule 7.1-1, a party must immediately file its disclosure statement with its first appearance, pleading, petition, motion, response, or other request addressed to the court. |
| Filing 6 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Federico Garibaldi re #1 Complaint,. Boyd Gaming Corporation served on 8/9/2021. (Garcia, Jill) |
| Filing 5 Summons Issued as to Boyd Gaming Corporation re #1 Complaint. (DRS) |
| Filing 4 STANDING ORDER. This case has been assigned to the Honorable Judge Gloria M. Navarro. Judge Navarro's Chambers Practices, which are posted on the U.S. District Court, District of Nevada public website, may also be accessed directly via this hyperlink #www.nvd.uscourts.gov. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - DRS) |
| Filing 3 CLERK'S NOTICE: Pursuant to Local Rule 16-6 this case has been assigned to the Early Neutral Evaluation Program. Magistrate Judge Brenda Weksler will be the evaluating judge in this case. (no image attached) (DRS) |
| Filing 2 CERTIFICATE of Interested Parties by Federico Garibaldi. There are no known interested parties other than those participating in the case (Garcia, Jill) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Boyd Gaming Corporation (Filing fee $402 receipt number 0978-6581329) by Federico Garibaldi. Proof of service due by 11/1/2021. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Summons) (Garcia, Jill) NOTICE of Certificate of Interested Parties requirement: Under Local Rule 7.1-1, a party must immediately file its disclosure statement with its first appearance, pleading, petition, motion, response, or other request addressed to the court. |
| Case randomly assigned to Judge Gloria M. Navarro and Magistrate Judge Daniel J. Albregts. (DRS) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Nevada District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Garibaldi v. Boyd Gaming Corporation | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Federico Garibaldi | |
| Represented By: | Jill Garcia |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Boyd Gaming Corporation | |
| Represented By: | Jen J Sarafina |
| Represented By: | Kaitlin H. Paxton |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
