Scott v. Garland et al
Plaintiff: Neil Scott
Defendant: Merrick Garland and Barbara Cegavske
Case Number: 2:2021cv01473
Filed: August 9, 2021
Court: US District Court for the District of Nevada
Presiding Judge: Daniel J Albregts
Referring Judge: Richard F Boulware
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights: Voting
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on August 9, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
October 4, 2021 Filing 13 NOTICE of Plaintiff's demographic identification by Neil Scott. (Attachments: #1 Identification - saved as Private due to personal identifiers contained within) (DRS)
September 17, 2021 Filing 12 NOTICE by Neil Scott of mailing re #10 Motion for default. (HAM)
September 10, 2021 Filing 11 NOTICE of Certified Mail Receipts by Neil Scott re #10 Motion for Entry of Clerk's Default. (HAM)
September 10, 2021 Filing 10 MOTION for Entry of Clerks Default, by Plaintiff Neil Scott. Responses due by 10/1/2021. (HAM) Modified event on 9/10/2021 (SLD).
September 9, 2021 Filing 9 NOTICE of IRS form 1040 by Neil Scott. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit) (HAM)
August 30, 2021 Filing 8 NOTICE of Exhibits by Neil Scott. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A-1, #2 Exhibit A-2, #3 Exhibit A-3, #4 Ex. B. Cover Sheet, #5 Exhibit B, #6 Ex. C. Cover Sheet, #7 Exhibit C, #8 Ex. D. Cover Sheet, #9 Exhibit D, #10 Ex. E. Cover Sheet, #11 Exhibit E) (HAM)
August 30, 2021 Filing 7 CIVIL COVER SHEET to #1 Complaint by Plaintiff Neil Scott. (HAM)
August 24, 2021 Filing 6 NOTICE Certified Mail Return Receipt by Neil Scott as to U.S. Attorney General. (HAM)
August 19, 2021 Filing 5 NOTICE of Proof of Service on Nevada Secretary of State 08/13/21 by Neil Scott re #1 Complaint. (Attachments: #1 Summons, #2 Certified Mail Receipt, #3 USPS delivery, #4 Return Receipt) (HAM)
August 19, 2021 Filing 4 NOTICE of Proof of Service on US Attorney General on 08/19/21 by Neil Scott re #1 Complaint. (Attachments: #1 Summons, #2 USPS delivery, #3 Certified Mail Receipt, #4 Justice Dept Rule) (HAM)
August 11, 2021 Filing 3 NOTICE of Exhibit A - E Cover Pages by Neil Scott (no exhibits attached). (HAM)
August 9, 2021 Filing 2 ADVISORY LETTER to litigant. (HAM)
August 9, 2021 Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Barbara Cegavske, Merrick Garland (Filing fee $402) by Neil Scott. Proof of service due by 11/7/2021. (Attachments: #1 Complaint and Request for Injunction, #2 Receipt #NVLAS076797) (HAM)
August 9, 2021 Case randomly assigned to Judge Richard F. Boulware, II and Magistrate Judge Daniel J. Albregts. (YAW)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Nevada District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Scott v. Garland et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Neil Scott
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Merrick Garland
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Barbara Cegavske
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?