Branch-Noto et al v. Sisolak et al
| Monica Branch-Noto and Tiffany Paulson |
| Stephen F. Sisolak, Aaron Darnell Ford and Clark County School District |
| 2:2021cv01507 |
| August 12, 2021 |
| US District Court for the District of Nevada |
| Daniel J Albregts |
| Jennifer A Dorsey |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 42 U.S.C. § 1983 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on July 26, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 15
RESPONSE to #8 Motion for Permanent Injunction by Defendant Clark County School District. Replies due by 10/15/2021. (Attachments: #1 Index of Exhibits, #2 Exhibit A - October 4, 2021 SNHD report, #3 Exhibit B - The Science of Masking to Control COVID-18, CDC, #4 Exhibit C - U.S. Dept. of Ed. Strategies for Safely Reopening Schools, #5 Exhibit D - Declaration of Monica Cortez, #6 Exhibit E - CCSD's Mask Policy, #7 Exhibit F - CCSD Physical Education Policy) (Hendricks, Kara)
|
|
Filing 14
CERTIFICATE of Interested Parties by Clark County School District. There are no known interested parties other than those participating in the case (Hendricks, Kara)
|
|
Filing 13
MOTION to Dismiss #1 Complaint,, by Defendant Clark County School District. Responses due by 10/22/2021. Discovery Plan/Scheduling Order due by 11/22/2021. (Attachments: #1 Index of Exhibits, #2 Exhibit A - October 4, 2021 SNHD report, #3 Exhibit B - The Science of Masking to Control COVID-18, CDC, #4 Exhibit C - U.S. Dept. of Ed. Strategies for Safely Reopening Schools, #5 Exhibit D - CCSD's Mask Policy) (Hendricks, Kara) NOTICE of Certificate of Interested Parties requirement: Under Local Rule 7.1-1, a party must immediately file its disclosure statement with its first appearance, pleading, petition, motion, response, or other request addressed to the court.
|
|
Filing 12
SUMMONS Returned Executed by Monica Branch-Noto. Clark County School District served on 9/20/2021. (Chattah, Sigal)
|
|
Filing 11
SUMMONS Returned Executed by Monica Branch-Noto. (Chattah, Sigal)
|
|
Filing 10
SUMMONS Returned Executed by Monica Branch-Noto. Aaron Darnell Ford served on 9/20/2021. (Chattah, Sigal)
|
|
Filing 9
MINUTE ORDER. Plaintiffs move for injunctive relief on an emergency basis #8 . Local Rule 7-4 governs emergency motions and requires a declaration setting forth, inter alia, "[t]he office addresses and telephone number of... all affected parties," along with "[a] statement of movant certifying... when and how the other affected people or entities were notified of the motion or, if not notified, why it was not practicable to do so." L.R. 7-4(a). "Failure to comply with the requirements for submitting an emergency motion may result in denial of the motion." L.R. 7-4(c). IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that the request for emergency treatment is denied for failure to provide this required information and because plaintiffs acknowledge that, "[a]t this juncture, there is no longer an Emergency...." ECF No. 8 at 2. Accordingly, the briefing schedule in Local Rule 7-2(b) applies to this motion. The record also does not reflect that any defendant has been served in this case either with process or the motion, as no certificate of service was attached to the motion. So IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that plaintiffs must file proof of service of the Motion for Preliminary Injunction #8 on all defendants by September 24, 2021. (no image attached) (chambers order) (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - JAD) Modified on 9/22/2021 to correct proof of service deadline (DC).
|
|
Filing 8
Emergency MOTION for Permanent Injunction by Plaintiffs Monica Branch-Noto, Tiffany Paulson. Responses due by 10/4/2021. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit) (Chattah, Sigal)
|
|
Filing 7
MINUTE ORDER IN CHAMBERS of the Honorable Judge Jennifer A. Dorsey on 9/20/2021. Order Denying Motion Without Prejudice Based on Noncompliance with Local Rules. Plaintiffs' Emergency Motion for Preliminary Injunction #6 exceeds this court's 24-page limit without permission to do so. See L.R. 7-3(b) (setting 24-page limit for all motions except those for summary judgment). Local Rule 7-3(c) states that "A motion to exceed these page limits must be filed before the motion or brief is due and must be accompanied by a declaration stating in detail the reasons for, and number of, additional pages requested...." Plaintiffs did not comply with this rule. Accordingly, Plaintiffs' Emergency Motion for Preliminary Injunction #6 is DENIED without prejudice to its refiling in compliance with the rules of this court. Plaintiffs are cautioned that the rule also states that permission to exceed page limits "will not be routinely granted" and requires "a showing of good cause"; motions to exceed page limits "must not be styled as an ex parte or emergency motion" and may not exceed three pages. L.R. 7-3(c). (no image attached) (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - JAD)
|
|
Filing 6
Emergency MOTION for Preliminary Injunction by Plaintiffs Monica Branch-Noto, Tiffany Paulson. Responses due by 10/4/2021. (Attachments: #1 Declaration, #2 Exhibit) (Chattah, Sigal)
|
|
Filing 5
CERTIFICATE of Interested Parties by Monica Branch-Noto that identifies all parties that have an interest in the outcome of this case. (Chattah, Sigal)
|
|
Filing 4
Summons Issued as to Clark County School District re #1 Complaint. (YAW)
|
|
Filing 3
Summons Issued as to Aaron Darnell Ford re #1 Complaint. (YAW)
|
|
Filing 2
Summons Issued as to Stephen F. Sisolak re #1 Complaint. (YAW)
|
|
Filing 1
COMPLAINT against All Plaintiffs (Filing fee $402 receipt number 0978-6593070) by MONICA BRANCH-NOTO. Proof of service due by 11/10/2021. (Attachments: #1 Summons, #2 Summons, #3 Summons, #4 Civil Cover Sheet) (Chattah, Sigal) NOTICE of Certificate of Interested Parties requirement: Under Local Rule 7.1-1, a party must immediately file its disclosure statement with its first appearance, pleading, petition, motion, response, or other request addressed to the court.
|
|
Case randomly assigned to Judge Jennifer A. Dorsey and Magistrate Judge Daniel J. Albregts. (YAW)
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Nevada District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
