Bibte Mining, Inc. v. Golden
Bibte Mining, Inc. |
Dan Golden |
Eugene Donlan and Rick Willard |
2:2021cv01508 |
August 12, 2021 |
US District Court for the District of Nevada |
Cam Ferenbach |
James C Mahan |
Torts to Land |
28 U.S.C. § 1441 |
Defendant |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on August 15, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 16 CERTIFICATE of Interested Parties by Bibte Mining, Inc., Eugene Donlan, Rick Willard. There are no known interested parties other than those participating in the case (Dunkley, Peter) |
Filing 15 MOTION for Partial Summary Judgment by Plaintiff Bibte Mining, Inc., Counter Defendants Bibte Mining, Inc., Eugene Donlan, Rick Willard. Responses due by 10/21/2021. Discovery Plan/Scheduling Order due by 11/14/2021. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1, #2 Exhibit 2, #3 Exhibit 3) (Dunkley, Peter) NOTICE of Certificate of Interested Parties requirement: Under Local Rule 7.1-1, a party must immediately file its disclosure statement with its first appearance, pleading, petition, motion, response, or other request addressed to the court. |
Filing 14 ANSWER to #7 Answer to Complaint, Counterclaim filed by Bibte Mining, Inc., Eugene Donlan, Rick Willard.(Dunkley, Peter) |
Filing 13 ACCEPTANCE OF SERVICE by Eugene Donlan, Rick Willard on 9/24/2021 executed by Dan Golden. (Ryan, Robert) |
Filing 12 Summons Issued as to Eugene Donlan, Rick Willard re #7 Counterclaim. (HAM) |
Filing 11 PROPOSED SUMMONS to be issued to Eugene Donlan by Counter Claimant Dan Golden. (Ryan, Robert) |
Filing 10 PROPOSED SUMMONS to be issued to Rick Willard by Counter Claimant Dan Golden. (Ryan, Robert) |
Filing 9 Joint STATUS REPORT REGARDING REMOVAL by Counter Claimant Dan Golden, Defendant Dan Golden. (Ryan, Robert) |
Filing 8 DEMAND for Trial by Jury by Counter Claimant Dan Golden, Defendant Dan Golden. (Ryan, Robert) |
Filing 7 AMENDED ANSWER to Complaint , COUNTERCLAIM against Bibte Mining, Inc. by Dan Golden. filed by Dan Golden.(Ryan, Robert) |
Filing 6 ORDER granting #5 Stipulation to Amend Answer; Plaintiff shall have until September 30, 2021 to respond to the counterclaims. Signed by Magistrate Judge Cam Ferenbach on 9/3/2021. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - HAM) |
Filing 5 STIPULATION and Proposed Order to Amend Answer by Defendant Dan Golden. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A) (Ryan, Robert) Modified on 9/2/2021 (EDS). |
Filing 4 STATEMENT REGARDING REMOVAL by Defendant Dan Golden. (Ryan, Robert) |
Filing 3 CERTIFICATE of Interested Parties by Dan Golden. There are no known interested parties other than those participating in the case (Ryan, Robert) |
Filing 2 MINUTE ORDER IN CHAMBERS of the Honorable Judge James C. Mahan on 8/12/2021. Statement regarding removed action is due by 8/27/2021. Joint Status Report regarding removed action is due by 9/11/2021. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - MR) |
Filing 1 PETITION FOR REMOVAL from Eighth Judicial District Court, Case Number A-21-834670-C, (Filing fee $ 402 receipt number 0978-6593368) by Dan Golden. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B, #3 Exhibit C, #4 Exhibit D) (Ryan, Robert) NOTICE of Certificate of Interested Parties requirement: Under Local Rule 7.1-1, a party must immediately file its disclosure statement with its first appearance, pleading, petition, motion, response, or other request addressed to the court. |
Case randomly assigned to Judge James C. Mahan and Magistrate Judge Cam Ferenbach. (MR) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Nevada District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.