Poll v. Motzkus et al
Peter Poll |
Ronald A. Motzkus and Monument Title Insurance, Inc. |
2:2021cv01591 |
August 27, 2021 |
US District Court for the District of Nevada |
Daniel J Albregts |
James C Mahan |
Contract: Other |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on March 15, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 14 REPLY to Response to #4 Motion to Dismiss by Defendants Monument Title Insurance, Inc., Ronald A. Motzkus. (Ogata, Christian) |
Filing 13 NOTICE of Appearance by attorney Christian Ogata on behalf of Defendants Monument Title Insurance, Inc., Ronald A. Motzkus. (Ogata, Christian) |
Filing 12 RESPONSE to #4 Motion to Dismiss by Plaintiff Peter Poll. Replies due by 10/8/2021. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit First Amended Complaint, #2 Exhibit Motion to Dismiss) (Whitney, Christen) |
Filing 11 Joint STATUS REPORT by Defendants Monument Title Insurance, Inc., Ronald A. Motzkus. (Dhalla, Aleem) |
Filing 10 ORDER Granting #8 Stipulation to Extend Time Re: #4 Motion to Dismiss. Responses due by 10/1/2021. Replies due by 10/18/2021. Signed by Judge James C. Mahan on 9/23/2021. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - JQC) |
Filing 9 MINUTE ORDER IN CHAMBERS of the Honorable Judge James C. Mahan on 9/22/2021 Re: #8 Stipulation. ERROR: Document not filed pursuant to LR IA 6-2 and LR IC 2-2(d) by attorney.CORRECTION: Attorney Christen Whitney is to properly format document #8 with the correct Article 3 Judge listed within the signature box pursuant to the local rules. File the corrected stipulation using the Notice of Corrected Image/Document event and link to document #8 . (no image attached) (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - NEV) |
Filing 8 First STIPULATION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME (First Request) re Discovery re #4 Motion to Dismiss by Plaintiff Peter Poll. (Whitney, Christen) |
Filing 7 NOTICE of Plaintiff's Disclosure Statement by Peter Poll. (JQC) |
Filing 6 MOTION to Extend Time (First Request) re #4 Motion to Dismiss by Plaintiff Peter Poll. (JQC) |
Filing 5 STATEMENT REGARDING REMOVAL by Defendants Monument Title Insurance, Inc., Ronald A. Motzkus. (Dhalla, Aleem) |
Filing 4 MOTION to Dismiss by Defendant Monument Title Insurance, Inc. and Ronald A. Motzkus. Responses due by 9/17/2021. (Dhalla, Aleem) Modified to include both filing parties on 9/3/2021 (EDS). |
Filing 3 MINUTE ORDER IN CHAMBERS of the Honorable Judge James C. Mahan on 8/30/2021. Statement regarding removed action is due by 9/14/2021. Joint Status Report regarding removed action is due by 9/29/2021. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - JQC) |
Case randomly assigned to Judge James C. Mahan and Magistrate Judge Daniel J. Albregts. (JQC) |
Filing 2 CERTIFICATE of Interested Parties by Monument Title Insurance, Inc.. There are no known interested parties other than those participating in the case (Dhalla, Aleem) |
Filing 1 PETITION FOR REMOVAL from Eighth Judicial District Court, Case Number A-21-837636-B, (Filing fee $ 402 receipt number 0978-6613145) by Monument Title Insurance, Inc., Ronald A. Motzkus. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B, #3 Exhibit C, #4 Civil Cover Sheet) (Dhalla, Aleem) NOTICE of Certificate of Interested Parties requirement: Under Local Rule 7.1-1, a party must immediately file its disclosure statement with its first appearance, pleading, petition, motion, response, or other request addressed to the court. |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Nevada District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.