Batcha v. Coast Hotels and Casinos, Inc.
Jany Batcha |
Boyd Gaming Corporation and Coast Hotels and Casinos, Inc. (incorrectly named as Boyd Gaming Corporation) doing business as The Orleans Hotel and Casino |
2:2021cv01643 |
September 7, 2021 |
US District Court for the District of Nevada |
Andrew P Gordon |
Nancy J Koppe |
Civil Rights: Jobs |
42 U.S.C. ยง 2000 |
Both |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on October 22, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 12 ORDER setting Early Neutral Evaluation session. Early Neutral Evaluation set for 12/21/2021 at 10:00 AM in LV Courtroom 3A by videoconference before Magistrate Judge Daniel J. Albregts. Signed by Magistrate Judge Daniel J. Albregts on 10/22/2021. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - HAM) |
Filing 11 CERTIFICATE of Interested Parties by Coast Hotels and Casinos, Inc. that identifies all parties that have an interest in the outcome of this case. Corporate Parent Boyd Gaming Corporation, Corporate Parent Coast Casinos, Inc. for Coast Hotels and Casinos, Inc. added. (Martin, Nicole) |
Filing 10 ANSWER to #6 Amended Complaint filed by Coast Hotels and Casinos, Inc.. Discovery Plan/Scheduling Order due by 11/28/2021.(Martin, Nicole) NOTICE of Certificate of Interested Parties requirement: Under Local Rule 7.1-1, a party must immediately file its disclosure statement with its first appearance, pleading, petition, motion, response, or other request addressed to the court. |
Filing 9 ORDER granting #8 Stipulation to Amend Caption. Signed by Magistrate Judge Nancy J. Koppe on 10/14/2021. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - HAM) |
Filing 8 STIPULATION MOTION to Amend Caption re #6 Amended Complaint, by Defendant Boyd Gaming Corporation. Responses due by 10/27/2021. (Martin, Nicole) Modified event on 10/13/2021 (SLD). |
Filing 7 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Jany Batcha re #6 Amended Complaint. Boyd Gaming Corporation served on 9/23/2021. (Hatfield, Trevor) |
Filing 6 AMENDED COMPLAINT with Jury Demand against Boyd Gaming Corporation by Jany Batcha. No changes to parties. (Hatfield, Trevor) |
Filing 5 CERTIFICATE of Interested Parties by Jany Batcha. There are no known interested parties other than those participating in the case (Hatfield, Trevor) |
Filing 4 Summons Issued as to Boyd Gaming Corporation re #1 Complaint. (HAM) |
Filing 3 STANDING ORDER. This case has been assigned to the Honorable Andrew P. Gordon. Judge Gordon's Chambers Practices, which are posted on the U.S. District Court, District of Nevada public website, may also be accessed directly via this hyperlink: #www.nvd.uscourts.gov. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - HAM) |
Filing 2 CLERK'S NOTICE: Pursuant to Local Rule 16-6 this case has been assigned to the Early Neutral Evaluation Program. Magistrate Judge Daniel J. Albregts will be the evaluating judge in this case. (no image attached) (HAM) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Boyd Gaming Corporation (Filing fee $402 receipt number 0978-6622973) by Jany Batcha. Proof of service due by 12/6/2021. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Summons) (Hatfield, Trevor) NOTICE of Certificate of Interested Parties requirement: Under Local Rule 7.1-1, a party must immediately file its disclosure statement with its first appearance, pleading, petition, motion, response, or other request addressed to the court. |
Case randomly assigned to Judge Andrew P. Gordon and Magistrate Judge Nancy J. Koppe. (HAM) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Nevada District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.