Chaiyakul v. Warden of High Desert et al
Chuck Chaiyakul |
Warden of High Desert and The Attorney General of the State of Nevada |
2:2021cv01667 |
September 9, 2021 |
US District Court for the District of Nevada |
Cam Ferenbach |
Andrew P Gordon |
Habeas Corpus (General) |
28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on December 1, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 6 RECEIPT of Payment: $ 5.00, receipt number NVLAS078048. (YAW) |
Filing 5 REQUEST for Judicial Notice re #4 Order on Motion/Application to Proceed in forma pauperis by Petitioner Chuck Chaiyakul. (YAW) |
Filing 4 ORDER denying #1 and #3 Motion/Application for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis Payment of filing fees due 11/2/2021. Signed by Judge Andrew P. Gordon on 9/27/2021. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - HAM) Modified on 9/28/2021 (EDS). |
Filing 3 APPLICATION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Petitioner Chuck Chaiyakul. (MR) |
Filing 2 NOTICE from USDC advising case against Warden of High Desert, et al., has been received and assigned case number 2:21-cv-01667-APG-VCF. (YAW) Modified text on 9/10/2021 (YAW). |
Filing 1 MOTION/APPLICATION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Petitioner Chuck Chaiyakul. (Attachments: #1 Petition for Writ Of Habeas Corpus, #2 Motion for Appointment of Counsel, #3 Judicial Notice) (YAW) |
Case randomly assigned to Judge Andrew P. Gordon and Magistrate Judge Cam Ferenbach. (JQC) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Nevada District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.