Nichols v. Trans Union, LLC et al
Rachel Nichols |
Trans Union, LLC, Experian Information Solutions, Inc., Capital Card Services, Inc. doing business as FSB Blaze Credit Card and Capital One Services, LLC |
2:2021cv01750 |
September 22, 2021 |
US District Court for the District of Nevada |
Nancy J Koppe |
James C Mahan |
Consumer Credit |
15 U.S.C. ยง 1681 |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on November 20, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 13 Joint MOTION to Extend Time (Second Request) re #1 Complaint,, by Defendant Trans Union, LLC. (Bergh, Jennifer) |
Filing 12 ORDER Granting #10 Motion to Extend Time re #1 Complaint (First Request). Trans Union, LLC answer due 11/24/2021. Signed by Magistrate Judge Nancy J. Koppe on 10/26/2021. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - MR) |
Filing 11 CERTIFICATE of Interested Parties by Trans Union, LLC that identifies all parties that have an interest in the outcome of this case. Corporate Parent TransUnion, Corporate Parent TransUnion Intermediate Holdings, Inc, Other Affiliate T. Rowe Price Group, Inc. for Trans Union, LLC added. (Bergh, Jennifer) |
Filing 10 Joint MOTION to Extend Time (First Request) re #1 Complaint,, by Defendant Trans Union, LLC. (Bergh, Jennifer) |
Filing 9 NOTICE of Appearance by attorney Jennifer Rebecca Bergh on behalf of Defendant Trans Union, LLC. (Bergh, Jennifer) |
Filing 8 CERTIFICATE of Interested Parties by Experian Information Solutions, Inc. that identifies all parties that have an interest in the outcome of this case. Corporate Parent Experian plc, Other Affiliate Central Source LLC, Other Affiliate Online Data Exchange LLC, Other Affiliate New Management Services LLC, Other Affiliate Vantagescore Solutions LLC, Other Affiliate Opt-Out Services LLC for Experian Information Solutions, Inc. added. (Gordon, Benjamin) |
Filing 7 ANSWER to #1 Complaint,, filed by Experian Information Solutions, Inc.. Discovery Plan/Scheduling Order due by 12/9/2021.(Gordon, Benjamin) NOTICE of Certificate of Interested Parties requirement: Under Local Rule 7.1-1, a party must immediately file its disclosure statement with its first appearance, pleading, petition, motion, response, or other request addressed to the court. |
Filing 6 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Rachel Nichols re #3 Summons Issued. Experian Information Solutions, Inc. served on 10/4/2021. (Haines, George) |
Filing 5 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Rachel Nichols re #3 Summons Issued. Trans Union, LLC served on 10/4/2021. (Haines, George) |
Filing 4 NOTICE of settlement with FSB Blaze Credit Card by Rachel Nichols re #1 Complaint,,. (Haines, George) |
Filing 3 Summons Issued as to All Defendants re #1 Complaint. (MR) |
Case randomly assigned to Judge James C. Mahan and Magistrate Judge Nancy J. Koppe. (MR) |
Filing 2 CERTIFICATE of Interested Parties by Rachel Nichols. There are no known interested parties other than those participating in the case (Kind, Michael) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants (Filing fee $402 receipt number 0978-6640717) by Rachel Nichols. Proof of service due by 12/21/2021. (Attachments: #1 Summons, #2 Summons, #3 Summons, #4 Summons, #5 Civil Cover Sheet) (Kind, Michael) NOTICE of Certificate of Interested Parties requirement: Under Local Rule 7.1-1, a party must immediately file its disclosure statement with its first appearance, pleading, petition, motion, response, or other request addressed to the court. |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Nevada District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.