Aldridge v. Federal National Mortgage Association
| Ernest C. Aldridge |
| Federal National Mortgage Association, Fannie Mae, Jorge M. Luna and Irena Damianova |
| 2:2021cv01816 |
| September 30, 2021 |
| US District Court for the District of Nevada |
| Daniel J Albregts |
| James C Mahan |
| Real Property: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on March 15, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 12 RESPONSE to #9 Motion to Remand to State Court by Defendant Federal National Mortgage Association. Replies due by 11/24/2021. (Miller, Christina) |
| Filing 11 MINUTE ORDER IN CHAMBERS of the Honorable Judge James C. Mahan on 11/4/2021. Regarding the Requirements of Klingele v. Eikenberry and Rand v. Rowland as to #10 Motion to Dismiss. Opposition due 14 days from the date of this Minute Order, and reply due seven 7 days after the filing of the opposition. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - SLD) |
| Filing 10 MOTION to Dismiss #7 Amended Complaint with Prejudice, by Defendant Federal National Mortgage Association. Responses due by 11/17/2021. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit, #2 Exhibit, #3 Exhibit, #4 Exhibit, #5 Exhibit, #6 Exhibit, #7 Exhibit, #8 Exhibit, #9 Exhibit) (Miller, Christina) |
| Filing 9 MOTION to Remand to State Court by Plaintiff Ernest C. Aldridge. Responses due by 11/17/2021. (JQC) |
| Filing 8 STATUS REPORT REGARDING REMOVED ACTION by Defendant Federal National Mortgage Association. (Miller, Christina) |
| Filing 7 FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT against Federal National Mortgage Association by Ernest C. Aldridge. Adds new parties. (HAM) |
| Filing 6 STATEMENT REGARDING REMOVAL by Defendant Federal National Mortgage Association. (Miller, Christina) |
| Filing 5 MINUTE ORDER IN CHAMBERS of the Honorable Judge James C. Mahan on 10/7/2021. Regarding the Requirements of Klingele v. Eikenberry and Rand v. Rowland as to #4 Motion to Dismiss. Opposition due 14 days from the date of this Minute Order, and reply due seven 7 days after the filing of the opposition. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - SLD) |
| Filing 4 MOTION to Dismiss by Defendant Federal National Mortgage Association. Responses due by 10/21/2021. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit, #2 Exhibit, #3 Exhibit, #4 Exhibit, #5 Exhibit, #6 Exhibit, #7 Exhibit, #8 Exhibit, #9 Exhibit) (Miller, Christina) |
| Filing 3 MINUTE ORDER IN CHAMBERS of the Honorable Judge James C. Mahan on 9/30/2021. Statement regarding removed action is due by 10/15/2021. Joint Status Report regarding removed action is due by 10/30/2021. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - JQC) |
| Filing 2 CERTIFICATE of Interested Parties by Federal National Mortgage Association. There are no known interested parties other than those participating in the case (Miller, Christina) |
| Filing 1 PETITION FOR REMOVAL from Eighth Judicial District Court, Case Number A-21-839163-C, (Filing fee $ 402 receipt number 0978-6650047) by Federal National Mortgage Association. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit, #2 Exhibit, #3 Civil Cover Sheet) (Miller, Christina) NOTICE of Certificate of Interested Parties requirement: Under Local Rule 7.1-1, a party must immediately file its disclosure statement with its first appearance, pleading, petition, motion, response, or other request addressed to the court. |
| Case randomly assigned to Judge James C. Mahan and Magistrate Judge Daniel J. Albregts. (JQC) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Nevada District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
