International Monetary v. Global Tech Industries Group, Inc. et al
| International Monetary |
| Global Tech Industries Group, Inc., Librty Stock Transfer and Liberty Stock Transfer, Inc. |
| 2:2021cv01820 |
| September 30, 2021 |
| U.S. District Court for the District of Nevada |
| Daniel J Albregts |
| James C Mahan |
| Contract: Recovery/Enforcement |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on November 8, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 11 STATUS REPORT by Plaintiff International Monetary. (Calaway, Alexander) |
Filing 10
ORDER Denying #7 Motion for Reconsideration. Signed by Judge James C. Mahan on 10/18/2021. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - MR)
|
| Filing 9 MOTION to Strike #1 Petition for Removal,, by Plaintiff International Monetary. Responses due by 10/28/2021. (Calaway, Alexander) (Main Document 9 replaced on 10/21/2021) (DKJ). |
| Filing 8 RESPONSE to #1 Petition for Removal,, by Plaintiff International Monetary. (Calaway, Alexander) |
| Filing 7 MOTION for Reconsideration re 6 Order on Verified Petition for Permission to Practice Pro Hac Vice, by Defendant Global Tech Industries Group, Inc. Responses due by 10/26/2021. (MR) |
| Filing 6 MINUTE ORDER IN CHAMBERS of the Honorable Judge James C. Mahan on 10/5/2021 #2 Verified Petition for Permission to Practice Pro Hac Vice and approving Designation of Local Counsel. The #2 Verified Petition for Permission to Practice Pro Hac Vice by Warren R. Markowitz and approving Designation of Local Counsel is DENIED due to the Petitioner failing the State Bar of Nevada exam. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - NEV) |
| Filing 5 NOTICE of Corrected Image/Document re #1 Petition for Removal, by Defendant Global Tech Industries Group, Inc.. (Service of corrected image is attached.) (Markowitz, Warren) |
| Filing 4 MINUTE ORDER IN CHAMBERS of the Honorable Judge James C. Mahan on 10/1/2021. Statement regarding removed action is due by 10/16/2021. Joint Status Report regarding removed action is due by 10/31/2021. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - MR) |
| Filing 3 CLERKS NOTICE of Violation of Federal Rule 28:1446 and Filer Action Required re: #1 Petition for Removal - ERROR: Documents missing re: #1 PETITION FOR REMOVAL as required by 28:1446(a). CORRECTION: Filer Warren Markowitz is advised to file the documents from the State Court case using the event Notice of Corrected Image/Document and link to #1 . (no image attached) (DKJ) |
| Case randomly assigned to Judge James C. Mahan and Magistrate Judge Daniel J. Albregts. (MR) |
| Filing 2 MOTION/VERIFIED PETITION for Permission to Practice Pro Hac Vice by Warren R. Markowitz and DESIGNATION of Local Counsel Daniel Allen (Filing fee $ 250 receipt number 0978-6650789) by Defendant Global Tech Industries Group, Inc.. (Markowitz, Warren) |
| Filing 1 First PETITION FOR REMOVAL from Clark County, NV District Court, Case Number A-21-41175-B, (Filing fee $ 402 receipt number 0978-6650786) by Global Tech Industries Group, Inc.. VIEW #5 Notice of corrected image to view the State Court documents. (Markowitz, Warren) NOTICE of Certificate of Interested Parties requirement: Under Local Rule 7.1-1, a party must immediately file its disclosure statement with its first appearance, pleading, petition, motion, response, or other request addressed to the court. Modified on 10/1/2021 to relate to #5 notice of corrected image which contains the state court documents (DKJ). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Nevada District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
