Mclucas v. Geico General Insurance Company
| Aysha Mclucas |
| Geico General Insurance Company |
| 2:2021cv01906 |
| October 15, 2021 |
| US District Court for the District of Nevada |
| Richard F Boulware |
| Elayna J Youchah |
| Insurance |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on November 8, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 7 NOTICE of Voluntary DIsmissal without Prejudice by Aysha Mclucas. (Rezaee, Preston) |
| Filing 6 STATEMENT REGARDING REMOVAL by Defendant Geico General Insurance Company. (Douglas, Matthew) |
| Filing 5 STANDING ORDER. This case has been assigned to the Honorable Judge Richard F. Boulware, II. Judge Boulware's Chambers Practices, which are posted on the U.S. District Court, District of Nevada public website, may also be accessed directly via this hyperlink: #www.nvd.uscourts.gov. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - JQC) |
| Filing 4 MINUTE ORDER IN CHAMBERS of the Honorable Judge Richard F. Boulware, II on 10/15/2021. Statement regarding removed action is due by 10/30/2021. Joint Status Report regarding removed action is due by 11/14/2021. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - JQC) |
| Filing 3 CLERK'S NOTICE Regarding Local Rule IC 5-1(b). ECF No. #2 , #1 was not filed pursuant to LR IC 5-1(b) by attorneys Thomas E. Winner and Matthew J. Douglas. Please note the signatory must be the attorney or pro se party who electronically files the document. No further action is required concerning this document at this time. Do not refile document. (no image attached) (SLD) |
| Filing 2 CERTIFICATE of Interested Parties by GEICO GENERAL INSRUANCE COMPANY. There are no known interested parties other than those participating in the case (Douglas, Matthew) |
| Filing 1 PETITION FOR REMOVAL from Eighth Judicial District Court, Case Number A-21-841159-C, (Filing fee $ 402 receipt number 0978-6666119) by GEICO GENERAL INSRUANCE COMPANY. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet) (Douglas, Matthew) NOTICE of Certificate of Interested Parties requirement: Under Local Rule 7.1-1, a party must immediately file its disclosure statement with its first appearance, pleading, petition, motion, response, or other request addressed to the court. |
| Case randomly assigned to Judge Richard F. Boulware, II and Magistrate Judge Elayna J. Youchah. (JQC) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Nevada District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Mclucas v. Geico General Insurance Company | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Aysha Mclucas | |
| Represented By: | Preston P. Rezaee |
| Represented By: | Richard F Scotti |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Geico General Insurance Company | |
| Represented By: | Matthew John Douglas |
| Represented By: | Thomas E. Winner |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
