Blessing-Alvarado v. Geico Indemnity Company
| Tania Blessing-Alvarado |
| Geico Indemnity Company |
| 2:2021cv01952 |
| October 25, 2021 |
| US District Court for the District of Nevada |
| Richard F Boulware |
| Cam Ferenbach |
| Insurance |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
| Defendant |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on November 29, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 8 Joint STATUS REPORT by Defendant Geico Indemnity Company. (Carlson, Jonathan) |
| Filing 7 STATEMENT REGARDING REMOVAL by Defendant Geico Indemnity Company. (Carlson, Jonathan) |
| Filing 6 MOTION to Dismiss by Defendant Geico Indemnity Company. Responses due by 11/15/2021. (Carlson, Jonathan) |
| Filing 5 MINUTE ORDER IN CHAMBERS of the Honorable Judge Richard F. Boulware, II on 10/25/2021. Statement regarding removed action is due by 11/9/2021. Joint Status Report regarding removed action is due by 11/24/2021. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - HAM) |
| Filing 4 STANDING ORDER. This case has been assigned to the Honorable Judge Richard F. Boulware, II. Judge Boulware's Chambers Practices, which are posted on the U.S. District Court, District of Nevada public website, may also be accessed directly via this hyperlink: #www.nvd.uscourts.gov. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - HAM) |
| Filing 3 DEMAND for Trial by Jury by Defendant Geico Indemnity Company. (Carlson, Jonathan) |
| Filing 2 CERTIFICATE of Interested Parties by Geico Indemnity Company that identifies all parties that have an interest in the outcome of this case. Corporate Parent Government Employees Insurance Company, Corporate Parent Berkshire Hathaway, Inc. for Geico Indemnity Company added. (Carlson, Jonathan) |
| Filing 1 PETITION FOR REMOVAL from Eighth Judicial District Court, Case Number A-21-840104-C, (Filing fee $ 402 receipt number 0978-6676057) by Geico Indemnity Company. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B, #3 Civil Cover Sheet) (Carlson, Jonathan) NOTICE of Certificate of Interested Parties requirement: Under Local Rule 7.1-1, a party must immediately file its disclosure statement with its first appearance, pleading, petition, motion, response, or other request addressed to the court. |
| Case randomly assigned to Judge Richard F. Boulware, II and Magistrate Judge Cam Ferenbach. (HAM) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Nevada District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Blessing-Alvarado v. Geico Indemnity Company | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Tania Blessing-Alvarado | |
| Represented By: | Burke Huber |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Geico Indemnity Company | |
| Represented By: | Frank A. Toddre, II |
| Represented By: | Jonathan W Carlson |
| Represented By: | Tayler D. Martinez |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
