Bahrampour v. National Security Agency et al
Plaintiff: Afshin Bahrampour
Defendant: National Security Agency, Department of Homeland Security, Central Intelligence Agency, Department of Energy, Environmental Protection Agency and Department of Justice
Case Number: 2:2021cv01954
Filed: October 25, 2021
Court: US District Court for the District of Nevada
Presiding Judge: Jennifer A Dorsey
Referring Judge: Nancy J Koppe
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights: Other
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on December 8, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
December 8, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 9 CLERK'S NOTICE that pursuant to Order signed by Chief Judge Miranda M. Du on 12/8/2021 (ECF No. 2 in 2:21-cv-2159), the clerk opened a new case number for the matter of Bahrampour's Application seeking leave to file per Judge Navarro's order dated April 14, 2017 (ECF No. #8 ). New case number is 2:21-cv-02159-MMD. ECF No. #8 is terminated in this case and re-filed in 2:21-cv-2159. Any supplement to Bahrampour's Application must be filed in 2:21-cv-2159. (no image attached) (AF)
December 3, 2021 Filing 8 MOTION for Leave to File by Plaintiff Afshin Bahrampour. (JQC)
November 24, 2021 Filing 7 JUDGMENT is entered in favor of Defendants without prejudice. This matter is now closed. Signed by Clerk of Court Debra K. Kempi on 11/24/2021. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - DRS)
November 24, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 6 ORDER Adopting #3 Report and Recommendation. This action is DISMISSED without prejudice to the plaintiff's ability to refile it if and when he first obtains leave of court. Plaintiff's #4 motion to extend time to comply with the vexatious-litigant order is DENIED because the requirement to obtain leave from the Chief District Judge is a prefiling requirement. The Clerk of Court is directed to SEND plaintiff a copy of his motion for leave (ECF No. 71 in Case No. 2:16-cv-985-GMN-VCF and 56 Order) and CLOSE THIS CASE. Signed by Judge Jennifer A. Dorsey on 11/24/2021. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF, copy of previous motion and order enclosed as directed. - DRS) Modified on 11/24/2021 (DRS).
November 8, 2021 Filing 5 MOTION for Extension of Time (First Request) to File Renewed In Forma Pauperis Application re Judge Navarros' Order, by Plaintiff Afshin Bahrampour. Responses due by 11/22/2021. (DRS) Modified event on 11/9/2021 (SLD).
November 8, 2021 Filing 4 OBJECTION to #3 Report and Recommendation by Plaintiff Afshin Bahrampour. Response to Objections to R&R due by 11/22/2021. (DRS)
November 1, 2021 Filing 3 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION - It is RECOMMENDED that the #1 Motion/Application for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis be DENIED and that this case be DISMISSED. Objections to R&R due by 11/15/2021. Signed by Magistrate Judge Nancy J. Koppe on 11/1/2021. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - DRS)
October 25, 2021 Filing 2 ADVISORY LETTER to litigant. (HAM)
October 25, 2021 Filing 1 MOTION/APPLICATION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Plaintiff Afshin Bahrampour. (Attachments: #1 Complaint, #2 Envelope) (HAM)
October 25, 2021 Case randomly assigned to Judge Jennifer A. Dorsey and Magistrate Judge Nancy J. Koppe. (HAM)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Nevada District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Bahrampour v. National Security Agency et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Afshin Bahrampour
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: National Security Agency
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Department of Homeland Security
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Central Intelligence Agency
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Department of Energy
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Environmental Protection Agency
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Department of Justice
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?