Brink v. GEICO Advantage Insurance Company
| Jayne Brink |
| GEICO Advantage Insurance Company |
| 2:2021cv02127 |
| November 30, 2021 |
| US District Court for the District of Nevada |
| Cam Ferenbach |
| James C Mahan |
| Insurance |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
| Both |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on December 21, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 8 Joint STATUS REPORT by Defendant GEICO Advantage Insurance Company. (Miller, Lara) |
| Filing 7 ANSWER with Jury Demand re #1 Petition for Removal, filed by GEICO Advantage Insurance Company. Discovery Plan/Scheduling Order due by 2/4/2022.(Miller, Lara) NOTICE of Certificate of Interested Parties requirement: Under Local Rule 7.1-1, a party must immediately file its disclosure statement with its first appearance, pleading, petition, motion, response, or other request addressed to the court. |
| Filing 6 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Jayne Brink. GEICO Advantage Insurance Company served on 12/1/2021. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1) (Blackburn, Ashley) |
| Filing 5 CERTIFICATE of Interested Parties by Jayne Brink. There are no known interested parties other than those participating in the case (Blackburn, Ashley) |
| Filing 4 STATEMENT REGARDING REMOVAL by Defendant GEICO Advantage Insurance Company. (Miller, Lara) |
| Filing 3 MINUTE ORDER IN CHAMBERS of the Honorable Judge James C. Mahan on 11/30/2021. Statement regarding removed action is due by 12/15/2021. Joint Status Report regarding removed action is due by 12/30/2021. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - YAW) |
| Filing 2 CERTIFICATE of Interested Parties by GEICO Advantage Insurance Company. There are no known interested parties other than those participating in the case (Miller, Lara) |
| Filing 1 PETITION FOR REMOVAL from Eighth Judicial District Court, Case Number A843963, (Filing fee $ 402 receipt number 0978-6715170) by GEICO Advantage Insurance Company. (Miller, Lara) NOTICE of Certificate of Interested Parties requirement: Under Local Rule 7.1-1, a party must immediately file its disclosure statement with its first appearance, pleading, petition, motion, response, or other request addressed to the court. |
| Case randomly assigned to Judge James C. Mahan and Magistrate Judge Cam Ferenbach. (YAW) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Nevada District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Brink v. GEICO Advantage Insurance Company | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Jayne Brink | |
| Represented By: | Ashley Marie Blackburn |
| Represented By: | Bradley S. Mainor |
| Represented By: | Joseph J. Wirth |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: GEICO Advantage Insurance Company | |
| Represented By: | Lara L. Miller |
| Represented By: | Thomas E. Winner |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
