Turney v. Richemont North America, Inc.
| Oksana Turney |
| Richemont North America, Inc. doing business as Van Cleef & Arpels |
| 2:2021cv02139 |
| December 2, 2021 |
| US District Court for the District of Nevada |
| Cam Ferenbach |
| Andrew P Gordon |
| Civil Rights: Jobs |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 2000 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on May 6, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 14 NOTICE PURSUANT TO LOCAL RULE IB 2-2: In accordance with 28 USC 636(c) and FRCP 73, the parties in this action are provided with a link to the "AO 85 Notice of Availability, Consent, and Order of Reference - Exercise of Jurisdiction by a U.S. Magistrate Judge" form on the Court's website - #www.nvd.uscourts.gov. AO 85 Consent forms should NOT be electronically filed. Upon consent of all parties, counsel are advised to manually file the form with the Clerk's Office. (A copy of form AO 85 has been mailed to parties not receiving electronic service.) (DRS) |
Filing 13
SCHEDULING ORDER granting #12 Discovery Plan and Scheduling Order Discovery due by 6/20/2022. Motions due by 7/20/2022. Proposed Joint Pretrial Order due by 8/19/2022. Signed by Magistrate Judge Cam Ferenbach on 1/27/2022.(Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - DRS)
|
| Filing 12 Stipulated Discovery Plan and Scheduling Order by Plaintiff Oksana Turney. (Kang, Patrick) |
| Filing 11 Joint STATUS REPORT by Defendant Richemont North America, Inc.. (Mahoney, Scott) |
| Filing 10 NOTICE of Plaintiff's Demand for Trial by Jury by Oksana Turney.. (Kang, Patrick) |
| Filing 9 ANSWER re #1 Petition for Removal,, filed by Richemont North America, Inc.. Discovery Plan/Scheduling Order due by 2/5/2022.(Mahoney, Scott) NOTICE of Certificate of Interested Parties requirement: Under Local Rule 7.1-1, a party must immediately file its disclosure statement with its first appearance, pleading, petition, motion, response, or other request addressed to the court. |
|
Filing 8
ORDER Setting Early Neutral Evaluation session. Early Neutral Evaluation set for 2/22/2022 at 10:00 AM by videoconference before Magistrate Judge Daniel J. Albregts. The written evaluation statements must be submitted by email to Kimberly_LaPointe@nvd.uscourts.gov by Noon on 2/15/2022. Signed by Magistrate Judge Daniel J. Albregts on 12/20/2021. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - DRS)
|
| Filing 7 CERTIFICATE of Interested Parties by Oksana Turney. There are no known interested parties other than those participating in the case (Kang, Patrick) |
| Filing 6 STATEMENT REGARDING REMOVAL by Defendant Richemont North America, Inc.. (Mahoney, Scott) |
| Filing 5 CERTIFICATE of Interested Parties by Richemont North America, Inc. that identifies all parties that have an interest in the outcome of this case. Corporate Parent Compagnie Financiere Richmont SA for Richemont North America, Inc. added. (Mahoney, Scott) |
| Filing 4 MINUTE ORDER IN CHAMBERS of the Honorable Judge Andrew P. Gordon on 12/2/2021. By Deputy Clerk: Kelly Ferris. Statement regarding removed action is due by 12/17/2021. Joint Status Report regarding removed action is due by 1/1/2022. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - KF) |
| Filing 3 STANDING ORDER. This case has been assigned to the Honorable Andrew P. Gordon. Judge Gordon's Chambers Practices, which are posted on the U.S. District Court, District of Nevada public website, may also be accessed directly via this hyperlink: #www.nvd.uscourts.gov. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - KF) |
| Filing 2 CLERK'S NOTICE: Pursuant to Local Rule 16-6 this case has been assigned to the Early Neutral Evaluation Program. Magistrate Judge Daniel J. Albregts will be the evaluating judge in this case. (KF) |
| Filing 1 PETITION FOR REMOVAL from District Court Eighth Judicial, Case Number A-21-843305-C, (Filing fee $ 402 receipt number 0978-6717663) by Richemont North America, Inc. dba Van Cleef & Arpels. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Index, #3 Exhibit A-B) (Mahoney, Scott) NOTICE of Certificate of Interested Parties requirement: Under Local Rule 7.1-1, a party must immediately file its disclosure statement with its first appearance, pleading, petition, motion, response, or other request addressed to the court. |
| Case randomly assigned to Judge Andrew P. Gordon and Magistrate Judge Cam Ferenbach. (KF) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Nevada District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Turney v. Richemont North America, Inc. | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Oksana Turney | |
| Represented By: | Kyle R. Tatum |
| Represented By: | Patrick W Kang |
| Represented By: | Tiffany Yang |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Richemont North America, Inc. doing business as Van Cleef & Arpels | |
| Represented By: | Scott M. Mahoney |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
