Lowe v. Walmart Inc. et al
| Jason Lowe |
| Walmart Inc. doing business as Walmart Neighborhood Market #4339 and Securitas Security Services USA, Inc. |
| 2:2021cv02192 |
| December 13, 2021 |
| US District Court for the District of Nevada |
| Daniel J Albregts |
| James C Mahan |
| P.I.: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
| Defendant |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on April 3, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 10
NOTICE PURSUANT TO LOCAL RULE IB 2-2: In accordance with 28 USC 636(c) and FRCP 73, the parties in this action are provided with a link to the "AO 85 Notice of Availability, Consent, and Order of Reference - Exercise of Jurisdiction by a U.S. Magistrate Judge" form on the Court's website - #www.nvd.uscourts.gov. AO 85 Consent forms should NOT be electronically filed. Upon consent of all parties, counsel are advised to manually file the form with the Clerk's Office. (A copy of form AO 85 has been mailed to parties not receiving electronic service.) (no image attached) (KF)
|
|
Filing 9
SCHEDULING ORDER granting #8 Discovery Plan and Scheduling Order. Discovery due by 10/7/2022. Motions due by 11/7/2022. Proposed Joint Pretrial Order due by 12/6/2022. Signed by Magistrate Judge Daniel J. Albregts on 1/14/2022. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - KF)
|
|
Filing 8
Proposed Stipulated Discovery Plan and Scheduling Order by Defendants Securitas Security Services USA, Inc., Walmart Inc.. (Wessel, Megan)
|
|
Filing 7
STATUS REPORT JOINT STATUS REPORT REGARDING REMOVAL by Defendants Securitas Security Services USA, Inc., Walmart Inc.. (Wessel, Megan)
|
|
Filing 6
CLERK'S NOTICE Regarding Local Rule IC 5-1(b). ECF No. #5 was not filed pursuant to LR IC 5-1(b). Please note the signatory must be the attorney or pro se party who electronically files the document. No further action is required concerning this document at this time. (no image attached) (MR)
|
|
Filing 5
CERTIFICATE of Interested Parties by Securitas Security Services USA, Inc. that identifies all parties that have an interest in the outcome of this case. Corporate Parent Securitas Security Services USA, Inc. for Securitas Security Services USA, Inc. added. (Fink, Leonard)
|
|
Filing 4
STATEMENT REGARDING REMOVAL by Defendant Walmart Inc.. (Wessel, Megan)
|
|
Filing 3
CERTIFICATE of Interested Parties by Walmart Inc.. There are no known interested parties other than those participating in the case (Wessel, Megan)
|
|
Filing 2
MINUTE ORDER IN CHAMBERS of the Honorable Judge James C. Mahan on 12/13/2021. By Deputy Clerk: Kelly Ferris. Statement regarding removed action is due by 12/28/2021. Joint Status Report regarding removed action is due by 1/12/2022. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - KF)
|
|
Filing 1
PETITION FOR REMOVAL from Eighth Judicial District Court, Clark County, NV, Case Number A-21-841653-C, (Filing fee $ 402 receipt number 0978-6730580) by Securitas Security Services USA, Inc., Walmart Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Exhibit A, #3 Exhibit B, #4 Exhibit C) (Wessel, Megan) NOTICE of Certificate of Interested Parties requirement: Under Local Rule 7.1-1, a party must immediately file its disclosure statement with its first appearance, pleading, petition, motion, response, or other request addressed to the court.
|
|
Case randomly assigned to Judge James C. Mahan and Magistrate Judge Daniel J. Albregts. (KF)
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Nevada District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
