Harris v. Johnson et al
DeAndre D. Harris |
Calvin Johnson and Nevada Attorney General |
2:2022cv00005 |
January 3, 2022 |
US District Court for the District of Nevada |
Richard F Boulware |
Elayna J Youchah |
Habeas Corpus (General) |
28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State) |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on January 11, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 4 JUDGMENT in favor of Nevada Attorney General and Calvin Johnson against DeAndre D. Harris. Signed by Clerk of Court Debra K. Kempi on 1/11/2022. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - KF) |
Filing 3 ORDER Denying without Prejudice #1 Motion/Application for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis. It is Further Ordered that this action is DISMISSED without Prejudice. The Clerk of Court is directed to enter Judgment accordingly. The Clerk of Court is directed to file a copy of #1 Application for IFP in Case No. 2:21-CV-2258-GMN-BNW. Signed by Judge Richard F. Boulware, II on 1/10/2022.(Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - KF) |
Filing 2 NOTICE from USDC advising case against Calvin Johnson, et al., has been received and assigned case number 2:22-cv-00005. (DRM) |
Filing 1 MOTION/APPLICATION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Petitioner DeAndre D. Harris. (No petition received with this electronically submitted Motion.) (DRM) |
Case randomly assigned to Judge Richard F. Boulware, II and Magistrate Judge Elayna J. Youchah. (SLD) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Nevada District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.