Rowe v. The State of Nevada et al
Michael Rowe |
The State of Nevada, Brian Sandoval, 2011 Nevada State Assembly Members and 2011 Nevada State Senate Members |
2:2022cv00014 |
January 4, 2022 |
US District Court for the District of Nevada |
Daniel J Albregts |
Jennifer A Dorsey |
Civil Rights: Other |
28 U.S.C. § 1331 |
Both |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on March 17, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 15 REPLY to Response to #10 Motion to Dismiss,, by Defendant The State of Nevada. (Parker, Carrie) |
Filing 14 CERTIFICATE of Interested Parties by Michael Rowe. There are no known interested parties other than those participating in the case (HAM) |
Filing 13 RESPONSE to #10 Motion to Dismiss, by Plaintiff Michael Rowe. Replies due by 2/22/2022. (HAM) |
Filing 12 MINUTE ORDER IN CHAMBERS of the Honorable Judge Jennifer A. Dorsey on 2/11/2022. Regarding the Requirements of Klingele v. Eikenberry and Rand v. Rowland as to #10 Motion to Dismiss. Opposition due 14 days from the date of this Minute Order, and reply due seven 7 days after the filing of the opposition. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - MR) |
Filing 11 CERTIFICATE of Interested Parties by The State of Nevada. There are no known interested parties other than those participating in the case (Parker, Carrie) |
Filing 10 MOTION to Dismiss #4 Amended Complaint, #1 Complaint, by Defendant The State of Nevada. Responses due by 2/24/2022. Discovery Plan/Scheduling Order due by 3/27/2022. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1) (Parker, Carrie) NOTICE of Certificate of Interested Parties requirement: Under Local Rule 7.1-1, a party must immediately file its disclosure statement with its first appearance, pleading, petition, motion, response, or other request addressed to the court. Modified on 2/10/2022 to relink document (SLD). Modified on 2/10/2022 (SLD). |
Filing 9 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Michael Rowe. The State of Nevada served on 1/20/2022. (DRS) |
Filing 8 MINUTE ORDER IN CHAMBERS of the Honorable Magistrate Judge Daniel J. Albregts on 1/26/2022. Re: #6 Motion to amend complaint. After filing his motion to amend complaint #6 , Plaintiff filed another motion to amend #7 . In light of Plaintiff's new motion, and because an amended complaint supersedes the original, IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that Plaintiff's motion to amend #6 is DENIED as moot. (no image attached) (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - KL) |
Filing 7 SECOND MOTION to Amend/Correct #1 Complaint, by Plaintiff Michael Rowe. Responses due by 2/8/2022. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Amended Complaint) (DRS) |
Filing 6 MOTION to Amend Complaint by Plaintiff Michael Rowe. Responses due by 2/1/2022. (KF) |
Filing 5 SUMMONS ISSUED as to The State of Nevada re #4 Amended Complaint. (KF) |
Filing 4 AMENDED COMPLAINT with Jury Demand against 2011 Nevada State Assembly Members, 2011 Nevada State Senate Members, Brian Sandoval, The State of Nevada by Michael Rowe. No changes to parties. (KF) (Main Document 4 replaced on 1/10/2022) (HAM). |
Filing 3 SUMMONS ISSUED as to The State of Nevada re #1 Complaint. (KF) |
Filing 2 ADVISORY LETTER to litigant. (KF) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against 2011 Nevada State Assembly Members, 2011 Nevada State Senate Members, Brian Sandoval, The State of Nevada (Filing fee $402 paid Receipt # NVLAS079056) by Michael Rowe. Proof of service due by 4/4/2022. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 NVLAS079056) (KF) |
Case randomly assigned to Judge Jennifer A. Dorsey and Magistrate Judge Daniel J. Albregts. (HAM) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Nevada District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.