Goodman v. Panda Express, Inc.
Liston Goodman and Liston M. Goodman |
Panda Express, Inc., Panda Express, Inc. doing business as Panda Express and Panda Restaurant Group, Inc. doing business as Panda Express |
2:2022cv00024 |
January 4, 2022 |
US District Court for the District of Nevada |
Richard F Boulware |
Elayna J Youchah |
P.I.: Other |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury |
Both |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on August 16, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 11 NOTICE PURSUANT TO LOCAL RULE IB 2-2: In accordance with 28 USC 636(c) and FRCP 73, the parties in this action are provided with a link to the "AO 85 Notice of Availability, Consent, and Order of Reference - Exercise of Jurisdiction by a U.S. Magistrate Judge" form on the Court's website - #www.nvd.uscourts.gov. AO 85 Consent forms should NOT be electronically filed. Upon consent of all parties, counsel are advised to manually file the form with the Clerk's Office. (A copy of form AO 85 has been mailed to parties not receiving electronic service.) (no image attached) (DRS) |
Filing 10 SCHEDULING ORDER granting #9 Discovery Plan and Scheduling Order - Discovery due by 6/23/2022. Motions due by 7/21/2022. Proposed Joint Pretrial Order due by 8/21/2022. Signed by Magistrate Judge Elayna J. Youchah on 2/1/2022.(Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - DRS) |
Filing 9 Proposed Discovery Plan and Scheduling Order by Defendant Panda Express, Inc.. (Lowry, Michael) |
Filing 8 MINUTE ORDER IN CHAMBERS of the Honorable Magistrate Judge Elayna J. Youchah on 1/26/2022. By Judicial Assistant: E. Santiago.Reluctant to elevate form over substance, the Court nonetheless denies the Proposed Discovery Plan and Scheduling Order (ECF No. 7) submitted by the parties. The proposed plan does not address LR 26-1(b)(9) (Electronic Evidence) or the due date for the joint pretrial order should dispositive motion be pending on the currently proposed due date.Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Proposed Stipulated Discovery Plan and Scheduling Order; Submitted in Compliance with LR 26-1(b) (ECF No. 7) is DENIED without prejudice.IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the parties must submit a revised proposed stipulated discovery plan and scheduling order within five (5) court days of the date of this Order.(no image attached) (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - ES) |
Filing 7 Proposed Discovery Plan and Scheduling Order by Defendant Panda Express, Inc.. (Lowry, Michael) |
Filing 6 STATUS REPORT by Defendant Panda Express, Inc. (Lowry, Michael) |
Filing 5 STATEMENT REGARDING REMOVAL by Defendant Panda Express, Inc.. (Lowry, Michael) |
Filing 4 MINUTE ORDER IN CHAMBERS of the Honorable Judge Richard F. Boulware, II on 1/4/2022. By Deputy Clerk: Kelly Ferris. Statement regarding removed action is due by 1/19/2022. Joint Status Report regarding removed action is due by 2/3/2022. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - KF) |
Filing 3 STANDING ORDER. This case has been assigned to the Honorable Judge Richard F. Boulware, II. Judge Boulware's Chambers Practices, which are posted on the U.S. District Court, District of Nevada public website, may also be accessed directly via this hyperlink: #www.nvd.uscourts.gov. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - KF) |
Case randomly assigned to Judge Richard F. Boulware, II and Magistrate Judge Elayna J. Youchah. (KF) |
Filing 2 CERTIFICATE of Interested Parties by Panda Express, Inc. that identifies all parties that have an interest in the outcome of this case. Corporate Parent Panda Restaurant Group, Inc. for Panda Express, Inc. added. (Lowry, Michael) |
Filing 1 PETITION FOR REMOVAL from Eighth Judicial District Court, Case Number A-21-843056-C, (Filing fee $ 402 receipt number 0978-6750345) by Panda Express, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Complaint, #3 Stip Dismissing Certain Party, #4 Amended Complaint, #5 Answer to Amended Complaint, #6 Panda's Jury Demand, #7 Arb Petition) (Lowry, Michael) NOTICE of Certificate of Interested Parties requirement: Under Local Rule 7.1-1, a party must immediately file its disclosure statement with its first appearance, pleading, petition, motion, response, or other request addressed to the court. |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Nevada District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.