Kumar v. Aargon Agency, Inc
| Lenora Kumar |
| Aargon Agency, Inc |
| 2:2022cv00102 |
| January 21, 2022 |
| US District Court for the District of Nevada |
| Daniel J Albregts |
| Andrew P Gordon |
| Consumer Credit |
| 15 U.S.C. ยง 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on February 28, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Civil Case Terminated pursuant to #8 NOTICE of Voluntary Dismissal by Plaintiff Lenora Kumar. (DRS) |
| Filing 8 NOTICE of Voluntary Dismissal by Plaintiff Lenora Kumar. (Krieger, David) |
| Filing 7 MINUTE ORDER IN CHAMBERS of the Honorable Magistrate Judge Daniel J. Albregts on 2/24/2022. Re: #6 Notice of Settlement. In light of the Notice of Settlement #6 that the dispute between the parties has been resolved and the request to vacate all pending deadlines, IT IS ORDERED that all pending deadlines are VACATED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that if a stipulated dismissal is not entered by April 25, 2022, the parties must file a joint status report explaining how much additional time is needed to complete settlement. (no image attached) (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - KL) |
| Filing 6 NOTICE of Settlement by Lenora Kumar. (Krieger, David) |
| Filing 5 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Lenora Kumar re #1 Complaint, #3 Summons Issued. Aargon Agency, Inc served on 1/24/2022. (Krieger, David) |
| Filing 4 STANDING ORDER. This case has been assigned to the Honorable Andrew P. Gordon. Judge Gordon's Chambers Practices, which are posted on the U.S. District Court, District of Nevada public website, may also be accessed directly via this hyperlink: #www.nvd.uscourts.gov. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - YAW) |
| Filing 3 SUMMONS ISSUED as to Aargon Agency, Inc re #1 Complaint. (YAW) |
| Filing 2 CERTIFICATE of Interested Parties by Lenora Kumar. There are no known interested parties other than those participating in the case (Krieger, David) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants (Filing fee $402 receipt number 0978-6768279) by Lenora Kumar. Proof of service due by 4/21/2022. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Summons Aargon) (Krieger, David) NOTICE of Certificate of Interested Parties requirement: Under Local Rule 7.1-1, a party must immediately file its disclosure statement with its first appearance, pleading, petition, motion, response, or other request addressed to the court. |
| Case randomly assigned to Judge Andrew P. Gordon and Magistrate Judge Daniel J. Albregts. (YAW) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Nevada District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Kumar v. Aargon Agency, Inc | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Lenora Kumar | |
| Represented By: | David H. Krieger |
| Represented By: | Shawn Wayne Miller |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Aargon Agency, Inc | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
