Mescia-Donnelly v. Camp et al
| Valerie Mescia-Donnelly |
| James D. Camp, Jr., James D. Camp, III, Lawrence Saul Blumberg and Nicholas A. Mescia, III |
| 2:2022cv00178 |
| January 28, 2022 |
| US District Court for the District of Nevada |
| Richard F Boulware |
| Elayna J Youchah |
| Real Property: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 Fed. Question |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on May 27, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 4 OBJECTION to #3 Report and Recommendation by Plaintiff Valerie Mescia-Donnelly. Response to Objections to R&R due by 2/28/2022. (HAM) |
Filing 3
REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION. IT IS RECOMMENDED that Plaintiff's Complaint (ECF No. #1 -2) be DISMISSED without prejudice so that Plaintiff may bring her claim in a court that has jurisdiction over the parties. Objections to R&R due by 2/15/2022. ORDER granting #1 Motion/Application for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis. Signed by Magistrate Judge Elayna J. Youchah on 2/1/2022. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - HAM)
|
| Filing 2 ADVISORY LETTER to litigant. (HAM) |
| Filing 1 MOTION/APPLICATION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Plaintiff Valerie Mescia-Donnelly. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Complaint, #3 Proposed Summons) (HAM) |
| Case randomly assigned to Judge Richard F. Boulware, II and Magistrate Judge Elayna J. Youchah. (YAW) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Nevada District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
