McLellan v. Garrett et al
| Curt McLellan |
| Tim Garrett and Aaron D. Ford |
| 2:2022cv00281 |
| February 14, 2022 |
| US District Court for the District of Nevada |
| Gloria M Navarro |
| Elayna J Youchah |
| Habeas Corpus (General) |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State) |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on September 12, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 3
NOTICE of Appearance by attorney Gerri L Hardcastle on behalf of Respondents Aaron D. Ford, Tim Garrett. (Hardcastle, Gerri)
|
|
Attorney update in case: Attorney Aaron D. Ford-AG withdrawn from the case. (Hardcastle, Gerri)
|
|
Filing 2
ORDER. IT IS ORDERED that the clerk add Aaron Ford, Attorney General for the State of Nevada, as counsel for respondents. IT FURTHER IS ORDERED that respondents must file a response to the petition, including potentially by motion to dismiss, within 60 days of entry of this order and that petitioner may file a reply within 30 days of service of an answer. Signed by Judge Gloria M. Navarro on 3/18/2022. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - regenerated #1 to AG - HAM)
|
|
Filing 1
PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus by Curt McLellan. (Attachments: #1 Index, #2 Exhibit, #3 Exhibit, #4 Exhibit, #5 Exhibit, #6 Exhibit, #7 Exhibit, #8 Exhibit) (HAM)
|
|
Case randomly assigned to Judge Gloria M. Navarro and Magistrate Judge Elayna J. Youchah. (HAM)
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Nevada District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
