EMT Ventures, LLC v. Specialized Loan Servicing LLC, et al
| EMT Ventures, LLC |
| Specialized Loan Servicing LLC and National Default Servicing Corporation |
| 2:2022cv00298 |
| February 17, 2022 |
| US District Court for the District of Nevada |
| Jennifer A Dorsey |
| Elayna J Youchah |
| Real Property: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on April 11, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 10
ORDER granting #8 Motion to Vacate and ORDER granting #9 Stipulation. Signed by Judge Jennifer A. Dorsey on 4/11/2022. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - HAM)
|
| Filing 9 STIPULATION re #8 Motion to Vacate by Plaintiff EMT Ventures, LLC. (Bohn, Michael) |
| Filing 8 MOTION to Vacate 6 Order on Motion to Dismiss,,,, Minute Order,,, by Plaintiff EMT Ventures, LLC. (Bohn, Michael) |
| Filing 7 JUDGMENT in favor of National Default Servicing Corporation, Specialized Loan Servicing LLC against EMT Ventures, LLC. Signed by Clerk of Court Debra K. Kempi on 3/10/2022. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - HAM) |
| Filing 6 MINUTE ORDER IN CHAMBERS of the Honorable Judge Jennifer A. Dorsey on 3/8/2022. ORDER granting #4 Motion to Dismiss. Defendant moves to dismiss this case #4 . Any response to that motion was due by 3/3/22, but the plaintiff did not file a response or move to extend the deadline to do so. Local Rule 7-2(d) provides that "[t]he failure of an opposing party to file points and authorities in response to any motion, except a motion under Fed. R. Civ. P. 56 or a motion for attorneys fees, constitutes a consent to the granting of the motion." I apply this rule and deem the plaintiff's failure to file a response as its consent to granting the motion. IT IS ORDERED that the motion to dismiss #4 is GRANTED. This case is dismissed, and the Clerk of Court is directed to CLOSE THIS CASE. (no image attached) (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - JAD) |
| Filing 5 STATEMENT REGARDING REMOVAL by Defendants National Default Servicing Corporation, Specialized Loan Servicing LLC. (Nielson, Krista) |
| Filing 4 MOTION to Dismiss by Defendant Specialized Loan Servicing LLC. Responses due by 3/3/2022. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A-F) (Nielson, Krista) |
| Filing 3 CERTIFICATE of Interested Parties by Specialized Loan Servicing LLC that identifies all parties that have an interest in the outcome of this case. Corporate Parent Computershare Limited for Specialized Loan Servicing LLC added. (Nielson, Krista) |
| Filing 2 MINUTE ORDER IN CHAMBERS of the Honorable Judge Jennifer A. Dorsey on 2/17/2022. Statement regarding removed action is due by 3/4/2022. Joint Status Report regarding removed action is due by 3/19/2022. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - HAM) |
| Filing 1 PETITION FOR REMOVAL from Eighth Judicial District Court, Case Number A-21-845750-C, (Filing fee $ 402 receipt number 0978-6801288) by Specialized Loan Servicing LLC. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Complaint, #2 Exhibit Summons, #3 Exhibit Affidavit of Service, #4 Exhibit NDSC's Declaration for Non-Monetary Judgment, #5 Exhibit Deed of Trust, #6 Civil Cover Sheet) (Nielson, Krista) NOTICE of Certificate of Interested Parties requirement: Under Local Rule 7.1-1, a party must immediately file its disclosure statement with its first appearance, pleading, petition, motion, response, or other request addressed to the court. |
| Case randomly assigned to Judge Jennifer A. Dorsey and Magistrate Judge Elayna J. Youchah. (HAM) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Nevada District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
