Decanio v. GEICO Advantage Insurance Company
James Decanio |
GEICO Advantage Insurance Company |
2:2022cv00356 |
February 25, 2022 |
US District Court for the District of Nevada |
Nancy J Koppe |
Cristina D Silva |
Insurance |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract |
Defendant |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on December 21, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 13 CLERK'S NOTICE that in order to create a caseload for U.S. District Judge Cristina D. Silva, this case is reassigned to Judge Cristina D. Silva for all further proceedings. All further documents must bear the correct case number 2:22-cv-00356-CDS-NJK. (no image attached) (AF) |
Filing 12 Joint STATUS REPORT by Defendant GEICO Advantage Insurance Company. (Carlson, Jonathan) |
Filing 11 REPLY to Response to #6 Motion to Dismiss by Defendant GEICO Advantage Insurance Company. (Carlson, Jonathan) |
Filing 10 NOTICE to Clerk of Court Regarding Assignment of Case to Magistrate Judge. (Document restricted under General Order 2021-03.) |
Filing 9 NOTICE to Clerk of Court Regarding Assignment of Case to Magistrate Judge. (Document restricted under General Order 2021-03.) |
Filing 8 RESPONSE to #6 Motion to Dismiss by Plaintiff James Decanio. Replies due by 3/23/2022. (Hengstler, Joel) |
Case randomly assigned to Judge Jennifer A. Dorsey and Magistrate Judge Nancy J. Koppe. (EDS) |
Filing 7 STATEMENT REGARDING REMOVAL by Defendant GEICO Advantage Insurance Company. (Carlson, Jonathan) |
Filing 6 MOTION to Dismiss by Defendant GEICO Advantage Insurance Company. Responses due by 3/17/2022. (Carlson, Jonathan) |
Filing 5 MINUTE ORDER IN CHAMBERS of the Honorable Magistrate Judge Nancy J. Koppe on 2/25/2022. Statement regarding removed action is due by 3/12/2022. Joint Status Report regarding removed action is due by 3/27/2022. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - JQC) |
Filing 4 NOTICE of Assignment of Case to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to General Order 2021-03. Attached is a form to indicate whether you consent or decline to proceed before a Magistrate Judge. Please submit your consent or declination form within 21 days of filing your complaint or appearing as a defendant. See notice for details. Consent or declination is due by 3/18/2022. Please file the completed form under the filing event called Notice to Clerk - Consent or Declination in the Representation and Appearances civil menu category. (JQC) |
Filing 3 DEMAND for Trial by Jury by Defendant GEICO Advantage Insurance Company. (Carlson, Jonathan) |
Filing 2 CERTIFICATE of Interested Parties by GEICO Advantage Insurance Company that identifies all parties that have an interest in the outcome of this case. Corporate Parent Berkshire Hathaway, Inc., Other Affiliate Government Employees Insurance Company for GEICO Advantage Insurance Company added. (Carlson, Jonathan) |
Filing 1 PETITION FOR REMOVAL from Eighth Judicial District Court Clark County Nevada, Case Number A-21-845137-C, (Filing fee $ 402 receipt number 0978-6809350) by GEICO Advantage Insurance Company. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B, #3 Civil Cover Sheet) (Carlson, Jonathan) NOTICE of Certificate of Interested Parties requirement: Under Local Rule 7.1-1, a party must immediately file its disclosure statement with its first appearance, pleading, petition, motion, response, or other request addressed to the court. |
Case randomly assigned to Magistrate Judge Nancy J. Koppe. (JQC) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Nevada District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.