Oliver v. Clark County Dentetion Center Medical
Plaintiff: Michael DeShawn Oliver, Ollie Norton and Michael Norton
Defendant: Clark County Dentetion Center Medical
Case Number: 2:2022cv00739
Filed: May 9, 2022
Court: US District Court for the District of Nevada
Presiding Judge: Nancy J Koppe
Referring Judge: Gloria M Navarro
Nature of Suit: Habeas Corpus (General)
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on September 20, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
June 29, 2022 Filing 7 MOTION to be put on the calendar by Plaintiff Michael DeShawn Oliver. Responses due by 7/13/2022. (LOE)
June 21, 2022 Filing 6 MOTION/APPLICATION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Plaintiff Michael DeShawn Oliver. (LOE)
June 21, 2022 Filing 5 MOTION for Appeal by Plaintiff Michael DeShawn Oliver. Responses due by 7/5/2022. (LOE)
June 6, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 4 ORDER IT IS ORDERED that the Petitioner will have 45 days from the date of this order to either pay the $5 filing fee or submit a complete IFP application with all required documentation. The initial screening of Petitioner's Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (ECF No. [1-1]) under the Rules Governing Section 2254 Cases is deferred to until such time as he has fully complied with this order. The Clerk of Court is instructed to send Petitioner a blank form IFP application for incarcerated litigants along with two copies of this order. See Order for further details Signed by Judge Gloria M. Navarro on 6/6/2022. (2 copies of this Order and the IFP application mailed to P - Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - KF)
May 31, 2022 Filing 3 LETTER from Michael Deshawn Oliver. (LOE)
May 9, 2022 Filing 2 NOTICE from USDC advising case against Clark County Detention Center Medical, et al., has been received and assigned case number 2:22-cv-00739-GMN-NJK. (LOE)
May 9, 2022 Filing 1 RECEIPT of Initiating Documents by Court on behalf of Petitioner. No Application to Proceed IFP or Filing Fee received. (Attachments: #1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus) (LOE)
May 9, 2022 Case randomly assigned to Judge Gloria M. Navarro and Magistrate Judge Nancy J. Koppe. (HAM)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Nevada District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Oliver v. Clark County Dentetion Center Medical
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Michael DeShawn Oliver
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Ollie Norton
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Michael Norton
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Clark County Dentetion Center Medical
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?