Bland v. United States Marshal Service et al
| Martell B. Bland |
| United States Marshal Service, Correction Corporation of America, Core Civic Inc, Damon Hininger, Theo Anderson, Nevada Southern Detention Center, A Thornton, J Peterson and Mr Silva |
| 2:2022cv00886 |
| June 2, 2022 |
| US District Court for the District of Nevada |
| Daniel J Albregts |
| Jennifer A Dorsey |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on October 10, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 4
ORDER Denying #1 Motion/Application for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Plaintiff has until 7/29/2022 to ether: (1) file a complete application to proceed in forma pauperis, or (2) pay the full $402 filing fee for a civil action. Signed by Magistrate Judge Daniel J. Albregts on 6/29/2022. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - JQC)
|
|
Filing 3
PROPOSED SUMMONS to be issued by Plaintiff Martell B. Bland. (Attachments: #1 Cover Letter) (JQC)
|
|
Filing 2
ADVISORY LETTER to litigant. (JQC)
|
|
Filing 1
MOTION/APPLICATION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Plaintiff Martell B. Bland. (Attachments: #1 Complaint, #2 Civil Cover Sheet, #3 Summons) (JQC)
|
|
Case randomly assigned to Judge Jennifer A. Dorsey and Magistrate Judge Daniel J. Albregts. (KF)
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Nevada District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
