Ramirez v. Equifax Information Services, LLC
| Christopher Ramirez |
| Equifax Information Services, LLC |
| 2:2022cv00908 |
| June 7, 2022 |
| US District Court for the District of Nevada |
| Andrew P Gordon |
| Brenda Weksler |
| Consumer Credit |
| 15 U.S.C. ยง 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on September 28, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 9 NOTICE of Settlement by Christopher Ramirez.. (Alpert, Steven) |
Filing 8
ORDER granting #7 Stipulation Re: #1 Complaint, Equifax Information Services, LLC answer due 7/26/2022. Signed by Magistrate Judge Brenda Weksler on 7/1/2022. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - HAM)
|
| Filing 7 First STIPULATION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME (First Request) to Answer re #1 Complaint, by Defendant Equifax Information Services, LLC. (Marina, Gia) |
| Filing 6 CERTIFICATE of Interested Parties by Equifax Information Services, LLC that identifies all parties that have an interest in the outcome of this case. Corporate Parent Equifax Inc. for Equifax Information Services, LLC added. (Marina, Gia) |
| Filing 5 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Christopher Ramirez. Equifax Information Services, LLC served on 6/14/2022. (Alpert, Steven) |
| Filing 4 STANDING ORDER. This case has been assigned to the Honorable Andrew P. Gordon. Judge Gordon's Chambers Practices, which are posted on the U.S. District Court, District of Nevada public website, may also be accessed directly via this hyperlink: #www.nvd.uscourts.gov. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - DRS) |
| Filing 3 SUMMONS ISSUED as to Equifax Information Services, LLC. (DRS) |
| Filing 2 CERTIFICATE of Interested Parties by Christopher Ramirez. There are no known interested parties other than those participating in the case (Alpert, Steven) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Equifax Information Services, LLC (Filing fee $402 receipt number ANVDC-6930426) by Christopher Ramirez. Proof of service due by 9/5/2022. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Summons) (Alpert, Steven) NOTICE of Certificate of Interested Parties requirement: Under Local Rule 7.1-1, a party must immediately file its disclosure statement with its first appearance, pleading, petition, motion, response, or other request addressed to the court. |
| Case randomly assigned to Judge Andrew P. Gordon and Magistrate Judge Brenda Weksler. (DRS) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Nevada District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Ramirez v. Equifax Information Services, LLC | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Christopher Ramirez | |
| Represented By: | Steven A Alpert |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Equifax Information Services, LLC | |
| Represented By: | Gia Marina |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
