Diminico v. GEICO Casualty Company
Plaintiff: Jezabel Diminico
Defendant: GEICO Casualty Company
Case Number: 2:2022cv01041
Filed: July 1, 2022
Court: US District Court for the District of Nevada
Presiding Judge: Richard F Boulware
Referring Judge: Brenda Weksler
Nature of Suit: Insurance
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 Petition for Removal- Breach of Contract
Jury Demanded By: Defendant
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on July 1, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
July 1, 2022 Filing 6 CLERK'S NOTICE Regarding Local Rule IC 5-1(b). ECF No. #3 , #1 , #2 was not filed pursuant to LR IC 5-1(b) by attorneys Thomas E. Winner and Lara Miller. Please note the signatory must be the attorney or pro se party who electronically files the document. No further action is required concerning this document at this time. Do not refile documents. (no image attached) (SLD)
July 1, 2022 Filing 5 MINUTE ORDER IN CHAMBERS of the Honorable Judge Richard F. Boulware, II on 7/1/2022. Statement regarding removed action is due by 7/16/2022. Joint Status Report regarding removed action is due by 7/31/2022. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - SLD)
July 1, 2022 Filing 4 STANDING ORDER. This case has been assigned to the Honorable Judge Richard F. Boulware, II. Judge Boulware's Chambers Practices, which are posted on the U.S. District Court, District of Nevada public website, may also be accessed directly via this hyperlink: #www.nvd.uscourts.gov. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - SLD)
July 1, 2022 Filing 3 CERTIFICATE of Interested Parties by GEICO Casualty Company. There are no known interested parties other than those participating in the case (Miller, Lara)
July 1, 2022 Filing 2 ANSWER re #1 Petition for Removal,, filed by GEICO Casualty Company. Discovery Plan/Scheduling Order due by 8/15/2022.(Miller, Lara) NOTICE of Certificate of Interested Parties requirement: Under Local Rule 7.1-1, a party must immediately file its disclosure statement with its first appearance, pleading, petition, motion, response, or other request addressed to the court.
July 1, 2022 Filing 1 PETITION FOR REMOVAL from Eighth Judicial District Court, Case Number A-22-853344-C, (Filing fee $ 402 receipt number ANVDC-6959311) by GEICO Casualty Company. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Plaintiff's complaint, #2 Exhibit Civil Cover Sheet) (Miller, Lara) NOTICE of Certificate of Interested Parties requirement: Under Local Rule 7.1-1, a party must immediately file its disclosure statement with its first appearance, pleading, petition, motion, response, or other request addressed to the court.
July 1, 2022 Case randomly assigned to Judge Richard F. Boulware, II and Magistrate Judge Brenda Weksler. (SLD)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Nevada District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Diminico v. GEICO Casualty Company
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Jezabel Diminico
Represented By: James J Ream
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: GEICO Casualty Company
Represented By: Matthew John Douglas
Represented By: Thomas E. Winner
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?