Devore v. Las Vegas Metropolitan Police Department et al
| Alexandria Devore |
| Las Vegas Metropolitan Police Department, Sheriff Joseph Lombardo and Kurt Mckenzie |
| 2:2022cv01045 |
| July 1, 2022 |
| US District Court for the District of Nevada |
| Cristina D Silva |
| Brenda Weksler |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Civil Rights Act |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on February 5, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 10
ORDER Granting #9 Stipulation to Extend Plaintiff's Time to Amend Complaint or Oppose Defendant's #7 Motion to Dismiss. Responses due by 9/8/2022. Signed by Judge Cristina D. Silva on 8/18/2022. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - KF)
|
|
Filing 9
STIPULATION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME (First Request) to Respond to #1 Complaint or Oppose #7 MOTION for Partial Dismissal, by Plaintiff Alexandria Devore. (McLetchie, Margaret) (extend) (sumjgm) Modified on 8/17/2022 to link document pursuant to LR IC 2-2(d) (SLD).
|
|
Attorney update in case: Attorney Craig R. Anderson added for Defendants Las Vegas Metropolitan Police Department, Joseph Lombardo, and Kurt Mckenzie as listed on the #7 Motion. (SLD)
|
|
Filing 8
CERTIFICATE of Interested Parties by Las Vegas Metropolitan Police Department, Joseph Lombardo, Kurt Mckenzie. There are no known interested parties other than those participating in the case. (Nichols, Jacqueline)
|
|
Filing 7
MOTION for Partial Dismissal, by Defendants Las Vegas Metropolitan Police Department, Joseph Lombardo, Kurt Mckenzie. Responses due by 8/25/2022. Discovery Plan/Scheduling Order due by 9/25/2022. (Nichols, Jacqueline) NOTICE of Certificate of Interested Parties requirement: Under Local Rule 7.1-1, a party must immediately file its disclosure statement with its first appearance, pleading, petition, motion, response, or other request addressed to the court.
|
|
Filing 6
SUMMONS Returned Executed by Alexandria Devore re #1 Complaint, #3 Certificate of Interested Parties. Las Vegas Metropolitan Police Department served on 7/21/2022; Joseph Lombardo served on 7/21/2022; Kurt Mckenzie served on 7/21/2022. (Attachments: #1 Affidavit Affidavit of Service - LVMPD, #2 Affidavit Affidavit of Service - McKenzie)(McLetchie, Margaret)
|
|
Filing 5
SUMMONS ISSUED as to Las Vegas Metropolitan Police Department, Joseph Lombardo, Kurt Mckenzie re #1 Complaint. (Attachments: #1 Summons, #2 Summons) (KF)
|
|
Filing 4
PROPOSED SUMMONS to be issued by Plaintiff Alexandria Devore. (Attachments: #1 Summons Summons - Lieutenant Kurt McKenzie, #2 Summons Summons - Sheriff Joseph Lombardo)(McLetchie, Margaret)
|
|
Filing 3
CERTIFICATE of Interested Parties by Alexandria Devore. There are no known interested parties other than those participating in the case (Wolpert, Leo)
|
|
Filing 2
CIVIL COVER SHEET to #1 Complaint, by Plaintiff Alexandria Devore. (Wolpert, Leo)
|
|
Filing 1
COMPLAINT against All Defendants (Filing fee $402 receipt number ANVDC-6960305) by Alexandria Devore. Proof of service due by 9/29/2022. (Wolpert, Leo) NOTICE of Certificate of Interested Parties requirement: Under Local Rule 7.1-1, a party must immediately file its disclosure statement with its first appearance, pleading, petition, motion, response, or other request addressed to the court.
|
|
Case randomly assigned to District Judge Cristina D. Silva and Magistrate Judge Brenda Weksler. (EDS)
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Nevada District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
