Smith v. CoreLogic, Inc et al
Plaintiff: Gina Smith
Defendant: CoreLogic, Inc, DataX, Ltd and Corelogic Teletrack
Case Number: 2:2022cv01096
Filed: July 11, 2022
Court: US District Court for the District of Nevada
Presiding Judge: Daniel J Albregts
Referring Judge: James C Mahan
Nature of Suit: Consumer Credit
Cause of Action: 15 U.S.C. ยง 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Jury Demanded By: Both
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on October 7, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
August 1, 2022 Filing 8 WAIVER OF SERVICE Returned Executed by Gina Smith. DataX, Ltd waiver sent on 7/28/2022, answer due 9/26/2022. (Krieger, David)
August 1, 2022 Filing 7 WAIVER OF SERVICE Returned Executed by Gina Smith. Corelogic Teletrack waiver sent on 7/28/2022, answer due 9/26/2022. (Krieger, David)
July 28, 2022 Party Corelogic Teletrack added as listed on the #6 Amended Complaint. (SLD)
July 28, 2022 Filing 6 First AMENDED COMPLAINT with Jury Demand against All Defendants by Gina Smith. Adds and removes parties. (Attachments: #1 Summons CoreLogic) (Krieger, David)
July 27, 2022 Filing 5 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Gina Smith re #3 Summons Issued, #1 Complaint,. DataX, Ltd served on 7/13/2022. (Krieger, David)
July 15, 2022 Filing 4 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Gina Smith re #3 Summons Issued, #1 Complaint,. CoreLogic, Inc served on 7/13/2022. (Krieger, David)
July 11, 2022 Filing 3 SUMMONS ISSUED as to CoreLogic, Inc, DataX, Ltd re #1 Complaint. (Attachments: #1 Summons Issued as to DataX) (EDS)
July 11, 2022 Filing 2 CERTIFICATE of Interested Parties by Gina Smith. There are no known interested parties other than those participating in the case (Krieger, David)
July 11, 2022 Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants (Filing fee $402 receipt number ANVDC-6968730) by Gina Smith. Proof of service due by 10/9/2022. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Summons CoreLogic, #3 Summons DataX) (Krieger, David) NOTICE of Certificate of Interested Parties requirement: Under Local Rule 7.1-1, a party must immediately file its disclosure statement with its first appearance, pleading, petition, motion, response, or other request addressed to the court.
July 11, 2022 Case randomly assigned to Judge James C. Mahan and Magistrate Judge Daniel J. Albregts. (EDS)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Nevada District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Smith v. CoreLogic, Inc et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Gina Smith
Represented By: Shawn Wayne Miller
Represented By: David H. Krieger
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: CoreLogic, Inc
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: DataX, Ltd
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Corelogic Teletrack
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?