Casab v. Walmart Stores Inc.
| David Paul Casab |
| Walmart Stores Inc., Walmart, Inc. doing business as Walmart #5269 and Wal-Mart Neighborhood Market |
| 2:2022cv01121 |
| July 13, 2022 |
| US District Court for the District of Nevada |
| James C Mahan |
| Elayna J Youchah |
| P.I.: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury |
| Defendant |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on August 18, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 2 MINUTE ORDER IN CHAMBERS of the Honorable Judge James C. Mahan on 7/14/2022. Statement regarding removed action is due by 7/29/2022. Joint Status Report regarding removed action is due by 8/13/2022. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - EDS) |
| Case randomly assigned to Judge James C. Mahan and Magistrate Judge Elayna J. Youchah. (EDS) |
| Filing 1 PETITION FOR REMOVAL from 8th District Court, Case Number A-22-848444-C, (Filing fee $ 402 receipt number ANVDC-6972740) by Walmart Stores Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet Cover Sheet, #2 Exhibit A, #3 Exhibit B, #4 Exhibit C, #5 Exhibit D, #6 Exhibit E, #7 Exhibit F) (Bonds, Kurt) NOTICE of Certificate of Interested Parties requirement: Under Local Rule 7.1-1, a party must immediately file its disclosure statement with its first appearance, pleading, petition, motion, response, or other request addressed to the court. |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Nevada District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
