Pacheco v. Virtus Commercial, LLC
Katie Lynn Pacheco |
Virtus Commercial, LLC |
2:2022cv01138 |
July 18, 2022 |
US District Court for the District of Nevada |
Richard F Boulware |
Brenda Weksler |
Labor: Fair Standards |
28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Fair Labor Standards |
Defendant |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on March 10, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 26 ORDER granting #25 Stipulation of dismissal with prejudice. Signed by Judge Richard F. Boulware, II on 3/10/2023. Case terminated. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - HAM) |
Filing 25 STIPULATION FOR DISMISSAL With Prejudice by Defendant Virtus Commercial, LLC. (Sliker, Joshua) (dismissal) |
Filing 24 MINUTES OF PROCEEDINGS - An Early Neutral Evaluation session was held on 1/18/2023 before Magistrate Judge Brenda Weksler. Pla Counsel: Philip J. Trenchak; Def Counsel: Joshua A. Sliker; Time of Hearing: 10:15 a.m. to 2:10 p.m.In addition to counsel, Plaintiff Katie Lynn Pacheco was present. Also, Virtus Commercial, LLC CEO Stephanie Morales and Zurich Insurance Representative Maria Zarrella were present on behalf of Defendant. The Court heard presentations from counsel and the parties. A settlement was reached. The parties are to execute settlement documents, complete settlement, and file dismissal paperwork by 3/18/2023. (no image attached) (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - RA) |
Filing 23 MINUTES OF PROCEEDINGS - A pre-Early Neutral Evaluation Telephonic Conference was held on 1/17/2023 before Magistrate Judge Brenda Weksler. Pla Counsel: Philip J. Trenchak; Def Counsel: Hilary A. Williams; Time of Hearing: 3:05 p.m. to 3:09 p.m. (no image attached) (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - RA) |
Filing 22 ORDER granting in part and denying in part #21 Stipulation; It is granted in all respects except that the expert disclosure deadline shall be March 13, 2023, and the rebuttal expert disclosure deadline shall by April 13, 2023. Discovery due by 5/15/2023. Motions due by 6/13/2023. Proposed Joint Pretrial Order due by 7/13/2023. Signed by Magistrate Judge Brenda Weksler on 1/13/2023. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - HAM) |
Filing 21 First STIPULATION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME (First Request) by Plaintiff Katie Lynn Pacheco. (Trenchak, Philip) (extend) (discovery) |
Filing 20 MINUTE ORDER IN CHAMBERS of the Honorable Magistrate Judge Brenda Weksler on 12/13/2022. IT IS ORDERD that ECF No. #19 Plaintiff's Motion for Leave to File Second Amended Complaint is DENIED without prejudice for the parties to meet and confer. See LR 16-1(d). If the parties cannot reach an agreement, Plaintiff may refile her motion to amend with a certification that she met and conferred with defense counsel. If the parties can agree, they may file a stipulation. (no image attached) (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - RA) |
Filing 19 MOTION for Leave to File Document by Plaintiff Katie Lynn Pacheco. Responses due by 12/26/2022. (Trenchak, Philip) (pleading) |
Filing 18 ORDER granting #17 Stipulation; Briefs due by 1/11/2023. Pre-ENE Telephonic Conference set for 1/17/2023 at 03:00 PM before Magistrate Judge Brenda Weksler. Early Neutral Evaluation set for 1/18/2023 at 10:00 AM in by Videoconference before Magistrate Judge Brenda Weksler. Signed by Magistrate Judge Brenda Weksler on 12/1/2022. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - HAM) |
Filing 17 STIPULATION TO CONTINUE (First Request) Early Neutral Evaluation Session Scheduled for December 8, 2022 re #16 Order Setting Early Neutral Evaluation Session,, by Defendant Virtus Commercial, LLC. (Williams, Hilary) (continue) (ene) |
Filing 16 ORDER setting Early Neutral Evaluation session. Pre-ENE Telephonic Conference set for 12/7/2022 at 03:00 PM in LV Chambers - Telephonic before Magistrate Judge Brenda Weksler and counsel only. Early Neutral Evaluation set for 12/8/2022 at 10:00 AM in LV Chambers - Videoconference before Magistrate Judge Brenda Weksler. Each partys written evaluation must be submitted electronically to judicial clerk Radia Amari at radia_amari@nvd.uscourts.gov by 4:00 p.m. on 12/1/2022. See Order for further details. Signed by Magistrate Judge Brenda Weksler on 10/13/2022. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - TRW) |
Filing 15 NOTICE PURSUANT TO LOCAL RULE IB 2-2: In accordance with 28 USC 636(c) and FRCP 73, the parties in this action are provided with a link to the "AO 85 Notice of Availability, Consent, and Order of Reference - Exercise of Jurisdiction by a U.S. Magistrate Judge" form on the Court's website - #www.nvd.uscourts.gov. AO 85 Consent forms should NOT be electronically filed. Upon consent of all parties, counsel are advised to manually file the form with the Clerk's Office. (A copy of form AO 85 has been mailed to parties not receiving electronic service.) (HAM) |
Filing 14 SCHEDULING ORDER granting #12 Discovery Plan and Scheduling Order; Discovery due by 3/13/2023. Motions due by 4/12/2023. Proposed Joint Pretrial Order due by 5/12/2023. Signed by Magistrate Judge Brenda Weksler on 10/13/2022. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - HAM) |
Filing 13 NOTICE of Corrected Image/Document re #12 Discovery Plan and Scheduling Order by Plaintiff Katie Lynn Pacheco. (Service of corrected image is attached.). (Trenchak, Philip) |
Filing 12 View Corrected Image #13 as to Stipulated Discovery Plan and Scheduling Order by Plaintiff Katie Lynn Pacheco.. (Trenchak, Philip) Modified on 10/12/2022 (EDS). |
Filing 11 MINUTE ORDER IN CHAMBERS of the Honorable Magistrate Judge Brenda Weksler on 10/3/2022. The parties' proposed discovery plan and scheduling order is past due. Accordingly, the parties must file a proposed discovery plan and scheduling order by 10/14/2022.(no image attached) (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - RA) |
Filing 10 REPLY to #7 Response to #3 Motion to Dismiss by Defendant Virtus Commercial, LLC. (Sliker, Joshua) Modified on 9/7/2022 (EDS). |
Filing 9 ORDER Granting #8 Stipulation to Extend Deadline to file Reply (First Request). Defendant Virtus Commecial, LLC Reply to #3 Motion to Dismiss due by 9/6/2022. Signed by Judge Richard F. Boulware, II on 8/29/2022. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - TRW) |
Filing 8 STIPULATION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME (First Request) to File Reply in Support of re #3 Motion to Dismiss, by Defendant Virtus Commercial, LLC. (Williams, Hilary) (extend) (sumjgm) |
Filing 7 RESPONSE to #3 Motion to Dismiss, by Plaintiff Katie Lynn Pacheco. Replies due by 8/29/2022. (Trenchak, Philip) |
Filing 6 ORDER granting #5 Stipulation Re: #3 Motion to Dismiss, Responses due by 8/22/2022. Signed by Judge Richard F. Boulware, II on 8/9/2022. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - HAM) |
Filing 5 STIPULATION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME (First Request) to Respond to Defendant's Motion for Partial Dismissal of Plaintiff's Amended Complaint re #3 Motion to Dismiss, by Plaintiff Katie Lynn Pacheco. (Trenchak, Philip) (extend) (sumjgm) |
Filing 4 ANSWER with Jury Demand re #1 Petition for Removal,, filed by Virtus Commercial, LLC. Discovery Plan/Scheduling Order due by 9/8/2022.(Sliker, Joshua) NOTICE of Certificate of Interested Parties requirement: Under Local Rule 7.1-1, a party must immediately file its disclosure statement with its first appearance, pleading, petition, motion, response, or other request addressed to the court. |
Filing 3 MOTION to Partially Dismiss #1 Petition for Removal, by Defendant Virtus Commercial, LLC. Responses due by 8/8/2022. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A - Plaintiff's Property Manager License, #2 Exhibit B - Plaintiff's Salesperson License)(Sliker, Joshua) |
Filing 2 CERTIFICATE of Interested Parties by Virtus Commercial, LLC. There are no known interested parties other than those participating in the case. (Sliker, Joshua) |
Filing 1 PETITION FOR REMOVAL from Eighth Judicial District Court, Clark County, Nevada, Case Number A-22-851897-C, (Filing fee $ 402 receipt number ANVDC-6976538) by Virtus Commercial, LLC. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B, #3 Exhibit C, #4 Exhibit D, #5 Exhibit E, #6 Civil Cover Sheet) (Sliker, Joshua) NOTICE of Certificate of Interested Parties requirement: Under Local Rule 7.1-1, a party must immediately file its disclosure statement with its first appearance, pleading, petition, motion, response, or other request addressed to the court. |
Case randomly assigned to Judge Richard F. Boulware, II and Magistrate Judge Brenda Weksler. (HAM) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Nevada District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Pacheco v. Virtus Commercial, LLC | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: Katie Lynn Pacheco | |
Represented By: | Philip J Trenchak |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: Virtus Commercial, LLC | |
Represented By: | Hilary A. Williams |
Represented By: | Joshua A Sliker |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.