Santos Caballero v. Sam's Club Store #6261
| Hilda Santos Caballero |
| Sam's West Inc. doing business as Sam's Club |
| 2:2022cv01183 |
| July 22, 2022 |
| US District Court for the District of Nevada |
| Daniel J Albregts |
| Cristina D Silva |
| P.I.: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 Petition for Removal- Personal Injury |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on September 16, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 9 RESPONSE to #7 Motion, by Plaintiff Hilda Santos Caballero. Replies due by 9/23/2022. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit to Motion to Remand to State Court)(Gazda, Lewis) |
| Filing 8 CLERK'S NOTICE Regarding Local Rule IC 5-1(b). ECF No. #7 was not filed pursuant to LR IC 5-1(b) by attorneys Kurt R. Bonds and Patrice Stephenson-Johnson. Please note the signatory must be the attorney or pro se party who electronically files the document. No further action is required concerning this document at this time. Do not refile document. (no image attached) (SLD) |
| Filing 7 First MOTION FOR RELIEF FROM ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFFS MOTION TO REMAND by Defendant Sam's West Inc.. Responses due by 9/21/2022. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B, #3 Exhibit C, #4 Exhibit D, #5 Exhibit E, #6 Exhibit F, #7 Exhibit G, #8 Exhibit H, #9 Exhibit I, #10 Exhibit J, #11 Exhibit K)(Bonds, Kurt) (misc) (referral) |
Filing 6
ORDER granting #5 Motion to Remand to State Court. Signed by Judge Cristina D. Silva on 8/24/2022.; Case terminated. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - certified copy of order and docket mailed to state court - HAM)
|
| Filing 5 First MOTION to Remand to State Court re #4 Motion to Remand to State Court by Plaintiff Hilda Santos Caballero. Responses due by 8/22/2022. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit to Motion to Remand to State Court)(Gazda, Lewis) |
| Filing 4 Motion Terminated as it appears counsel refiled at #5 with Exhibits. First MOTION to Remand to State Court by Plaintiff Hilda Santos Caballero. Responses due by 8/22/2022. (Gazda, Lewis) Modified on 8/8/2022 (DRS) - Counsel is strongly advised to call the Clerk's office in advance if assistance is needed for proper filing procedures. |
| Filing 3 STRICKEN - Entered in Error by Clerk STANDING ORDER. This case has been assigned to the Honorable Craig S. Denney. Judge Denney's Civil Standing Order is posted on the U.S. District Court, District of Nevada public website and may be accessed directly via this hyperlink: #www.nvd.uscourts.gov. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - HAM) Modified on 7/27/2022 (HAM). Modified on 7/27/2022 (HAM). |
| Filing 2 MINUTE ORDER IN CHAMBERS of the Honorable Judge Cristina D. Silva on 7/22/2022. Statement regarding removed action is due by 8/6/2022. Joint Status Report regarding removed action is due by 8/21/2022. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - HAM) |
| Filing 1 PETITION FOR REMOVAL from 8th District Court, Case Number A-22-846184-C, (Filing fee $ 402 receipt number ANVDC-6983274) by Sam's Club Store #6261. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B, #3 Exhibit C, #4 Exhibit D) (Bonds, Kurt) NOTICE of Certificate of Interested Parties requirement: Under Local Rule 7.1-1, a party must immediately file its disclosure statement with its first appearance, pleading, petition, motion, response, or other request addressed to the court. |
| Case randomly assigned to Judge Cristina D. Silva and Magistrate Judge Daniel J. Albregts. (HAM) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Nevada District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
