Brown v. Chicago Title Insurance Company
| Edward Brown |
| Chicago Title Insurance Company and Chicago Title Agency of Nevada |
| 2:2022cv01186 |
| July 24, 2022 |
| US District Court for the District of Nevada |
| Nancy J Koppe |
| James C Mahan |
| Insurance |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 Petition for Removal- Insurance Contract |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on October 31, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 13
REPLY to Response to #8 Motion to Remand to State Court by Plaintiff Edward Brown. (Dragon, Lindsay)
|
|
Filing 12
REQUEST for Judicial Notice re #11 Response by Defendant Chicago Title Insurance Company.. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A - Chicago Title Insurance Companys Insurer license, #2 Exhibit B - Chicago Title of Nevada, Inc.s license, #3 Exhibit C - Certificate of Compliance issued to Chicago Title of Nevada, Inc. by the Nevada Division of Insurance)(Gizer, Scott)
|
|
Filing 11
RESPONSE to #8 Motion to Remand to State Court by Defendant Chicago Title Insurance Company. Replies due by 9/13/2022. (Gizer, Scott)
|
|
Filing 10
ORDER Granting #9 Stipulation to Stay Case Pending Motion for Remand. Signed by Judge James C. Mahan on 8/29/2022. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - JQC)
|
|
Filing 9
STIPULATION TO STAY CASE Pending #8 Motion for Remand by Defendant Chicago Title Insurance Company. (Sinclair, Kevin) (stay) (dispositive) Modified to link to underlying motion on 8/26/2022 (EDS).
|
|
Filing 8
MOTION to Remand to State Court re #1 Petition for Removal,, by Plaintiff Edward Brown. Responses due by 9/6/2022. (Dragon, Lindsay)
|
|
Filing 7
SUMMONS Returned Executed by Edward Brown. Chicago Title Insurance Company served on 8/8/2022. (Dragon, Lindsay)
|
|
Filing 6
SUMMONS Returned Executed by Edward Brown. Chicago Title Agency of Nevada served on 8/8/2022. (Dragon, Lindsay)
|
|
Filing 5
STATEMENT REGARDING REMOVAL by Defendant Chicago Title Insurance Company.. (Sinclair, Kevin)
|
|
Filing 4
Joint STATUS REPORT Regarding Removed Case by Defendant Chicago Title Insurance Company.. (Sinclair, Kevin)
|
|
Filing 3
MINUTE ORDER IN CHAMBERS of the Honorable Judge James C. Mahan on 7/25/2022. Statement regarding removed action is due by 8/9/2022. Joint Status Report regarding removed action is due by 8/24/2022. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - JQC)
|
|
Filing 2
CERTIFICATE of Interested Parties by Chicago Title Insurance Company that identifies all parties that have an interest in the outcome of this case. Corporate Parent Fidelity National Title Group, Inc., Corporate Parent Fidelity National Financial, Inc., Corporate Parent FNTG HOLDINGS, LLC for Chicago Title Insurance Company added. (Sinclair, Kevin)
|
|
Case randomly assigned to Judge James C. Mahan and Magistrate Judge Nancy J. Koppe. (JQC)
|
|
Filing 1
PETITION FOR REMOVAL from Eighth Judicial District Court, Case Number A-22-855808-C, (Filing fee $ 402 receipt number ANVDC-6984169) by Chicago Title Insurance Company. Proof of service due by 10/20/2022. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit One, #2 Exhibit Two, #3 Civil Cover Sheet) (Sinclair, Kevin) NOTICE of Certificate of Interested Parties requirement: Under Local Rule 7.1-1, a party must immediately file its disclosure statement with its first appearance, pleading, petition, motion, response, or other request addressed to the court.
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Nevada District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
