Woodman v. Medicredit, Inc.
| Brittany Woodman |
| Medicredit, Inc. |
| 2:2022cv01210 |
| July 27, 2022 |
| US District Court for the District of Nevada |
| James C Mahan |
| Brenda Weksler |
| Consumer Credit |
| 15 U.S.C. ยง 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on June 28, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 9 NOTICE of Change of Address by Michael Everett Yancey, III. (Yancey, Michael) |
| Filing 8 CERTIFICATE of Interested Parties by Medicredit, Inc. that identifies all parties that have an interest in the outcome of this case. Corporate Parent Parallon Revenue Cycle Services, Inc. for Medicredit, Inc. added.. (Bacon, Mary) |
| Filing 7 ANSWER to #1 Complaint, Defendant Medicredit, Inc.'s Answer and Affirmative Defenses to Plaintiff's Complaint filed by Medicredit, Inc.. Discovery Plan/Scheduling Order due by 10/21/2022.(Bacon, Mary) NOTICE of Certificate of Interested Parties requirement: Under Local Rule 7.1-1, a party must immediately file its disclosure statement with its first appearance, pleading, petition, motion, response, or other request addressed to the court. |
Filing 6
ORDER Granting #5 Stipulation to Extend Deadline to Answer #1 Complaint. Medicredit, Inc. answer due 9/8/2022. Signed by Magistrate Judge Brenda Weksler on 9/6/2022. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - KF)
|
| Filing 5 STIPULATION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME (First Request) Stipulation and Order to Extend Defendant's Time to Respond to Plaintiff's Complaint (First Request) by Defendant Medicredit, Inc.. (Bacon, Mary) (extend) (answer) |
| Filing 4 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Brittany Woodman. Medicredit, Inc. served on 8/4/2022. (Yancey, Michael) |
| Filing 3 SUMMONS ISSUED as to Medicredit, Inc. re #1 Complaint. (KF) |
| Case randomly assigned to Judge James C. Mahan and Magistrate Judge Brenda Weksler. (KF) |
| Filing 2 CERTIFICATE of Interested Parties by Brittany Woodman. There are no known interested parties other than those participating in the case (Yancey, Michael) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Medicredit, Inc. (Filing fee $402 receipt number ANVDC-6988860) by Brittany Woodman. Proof of service due by 10/25/2022. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Summons) (Yancey, Michael) NOTICE of Certificate of Interested Parties requirement: Under Local Rule 7.1-1, a party must immediately file its disclosure statement with its first appearance, pleading, petition, motion, response, or other request addressed to the court. |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Nevada District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Woodman v. Medicredit, Inc. | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Brittany Woodman | |
| Represented By: | Michael Everett Yancey, III |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Medicredit, Inc. | |
| Represented By: | Mary E Bacon |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
