Clark v. State of Nevada et al
| Walter Clark |
| State of Nevada, Calvin Johnson, Marino and L De Costa |
| Nevada Deparment of Corrections |
| 2:2022cv01260 |
| August 5, 2022 |
| US District Court for the District of Nevada |
| Andrew P Gordon |
| Elayna J Youchah |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on December 9, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 7
LIMITED NOTICE of Appearance by attorney Chris William Davis on behalf of Interested Party Nevada Deparment of Corrections. (Davis, Chris)
|
|
Filing 6
COMPLAINT against L De Costa, Calvin Johnson, Marino, Nevada Deparment of Corrections by Walter Clark. Filed per #5 Screening Order. (Copy to be provided to P through the law library - KF)
|
|
Filing 5
SCREENING ORDER. IT IS ORDERED that the decision on the #4 IFP Application is DEFERRED.IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk is to file the 1-1 Complaint and send Clark a courtesy copy. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that this action is STAYED for 90 days to allow Clark and the defendants an opportunity to settle their dispute before the $350.00 filing fee is paid.IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk of Court is to add the Nevada Department of Corrections to the docket as an Interested Party and electronically serve a copy of this Order and the Complaint on the Office of the Attorney General of the State of Nevada by adding the AG to the interested party on the docket (docket updated). The Attorney General's office must advise the Court within 21 days of the date of this Order whether it will enter limited notice of appearance.See Order for further details. Signed by Judge Andrew P. Gordon on 9/10/2022. (copy of complaint sent to P and AG)(Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - KF)
|
|
Filing 4
MOTION/APPLICATION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Plaintiff Walter Clark. (HKL)
|
|
Filing 3
ORDER Denying without Prejudice #1 Motion/Application for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis.IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Plaintiff is granted a one time extension to file a complete IFP application containing all three of the required documents. Plaintiff must file a complete IFP application on or before 9/8/2022. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that if Plaintiff is unable to file a complete IFP application with all three required documents on or before 9/8/2022, the Court will recommend this case be dismissed without prejudice. The Court will retain Plaintiffs civil rights complaint (ECF No. 1-1) but the Court will not file the complaint unless and until Plaintiff timely files a complete IFP application with all three documents or pays the $402 filing fee. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk of the Court will send Plaintiff the approved form application to proceed in forma pauperis by an inmate, as well as the document entitled information and instructions for filing an in forma pauperis application. Signed by Magistrate Judge Elayna J. Youchah on 8/8/2022. (Attachments: #1 IFP Application and Instructions - to be provided to P through the law library)(Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - KF)
|
|
Filing 2
ADVISORY LETTER to litigant. (HKL)
|
|
Filing 1
MOTION/APPLICATION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Plaintiff Walter Clark. (Attachments: #1 Complaint) (HKL)
|
|
Case randomly assigned to Judge Andrew P. Gordon and Magistrate Judge Elayna J. Youchah. (TRW)
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Nevada District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
