Frazier-Swayne v. Clarity Services, Inc. et al
Phylus Frazier-Swayne |
Clarity Services, Inc. and CNU Online Holdings, LLC |
2:2022cv01364 |
August 23, 2022 |
US District Court for the District of Nevada |
Las Vegas Office |
Cam Ferenbach |
Gloria M Navarro |
Consumer Credit |
15 U.S.C. ยง 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on June 29, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 13 ORDER Granting #12 Motion to Extend Time to respond to complaint. CNU Online Holdings, LLC answer due 10/31/2022. Signed by Magistrate Judge Cam Ferenbach on 10/18/2022. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - LOE) |
Filing 12 Joint MOTION to Extend Time (Fourth Request) to Respond to #1 Complaint re #10 Order, by Defendant CNU Online Holdings, LLC. Responses due by 10/31/2022. (Chavez, David) (answer) Modified on 10/18/2022 to link document pursuant to LR IC 2-2(d) (SLD). |
Filing 11 NOTICE of settlement between Plaintiff and Clarity Services, Inc. by Phylus Frazier-Swayne re #1 Complaint,.. (Kind, Michael) |
Filing 10 ORDER Granting #9 Motion to Extend Time to respond to complaint. CNU Online Holdings, LLC answer due 10/18/2022. Signed by Magistrate Judge Cam Ferenbach on 10/11/2022. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - LOE) |
Filing 9 Joint MOTION to Extend Time (Third Request) to Respond to #1 Complaint re #8 Order, by Defendant CNU Online Holdings, LLC. Responses due by 10/24/2022. (Chavez, David) (answer) Modified on 10/12/2022 to link document to Order (SLD). |
Filing 8 ORDER Granting #7 Motion to Extend Time (Second Request). CNU Online Holdings, LLC Answer re #1 Complaint due 10/10/2022. Signed by Magistrate Judge Cam Ferenbach on 10/6/2022. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - TRW) |
Filing 7 Joint MOTION to Extend Time (Second Request) re #1 Complaint, by Defendant CNU Online Holdings, LLC. Responses due by 10/14/2022. (Chavez, David) (answer) |
Filing 6 ORDER Granting #5 Motion to Extend deadline to respond to complaint. CNU Online Holdings, LLC answer due 9/30/2022. Signed by Magistrate Judge Cam Ferenbach on 9/19/2022. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - LOE) |
Filing 5 Joint MOTION to Extend Time (First Request) and Proposed Order re #1 Complaint, by Defendant CNU Online Holdings, LLC. Responses due by 9/30/2022. (Chavez, David) (answer) |
Filing 4 SUMMONS ISSUED as to CNU Online Holdings, LLC, Clarity Services, Inc. (LOE) |
Filing 3 STANDING ORDER. This case has been assigned to the Honorable Judge Gloria M. Navarro. Judge Navarro's Chambers Practices, which are posted on the U.S. District Court, District of Nevada public website, may also be accessed directly via this hyperlink #www.nvd.uscourts.gov. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - LOE) |
Case randomly assigned to Judge Gloria M. Navarro and Magistrate Judge Cam Ferenbach. (LOE) |
Filing 2 CERTIFICATE of Interested Parties by Phylus Frazier-Swayne. There are no known interested parties other than those participating in the case (Kind, Michael) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants (Filing fee $402 receipt number ANVDC-7021572) by Phylus Frazier-Swayne. Proof of service due by 11/21/2022. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Summons, #3 Summons) (Kind, Michael) NOTICE of Certificate of Interested Parties requirement: Under Local Rule 7.1-1, a party must immediately file its disclosure statement with its first appearance, pleading, petition, motion, response, or other request addressed to the court. |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Nevada District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.