Harmer v. Samsung Electronics America, Inc.
Shelby Harmer |
Samsung Electronics America, Inc. |
2:2022cv01437 |
September 6, 2022 |
US District Court for the District of Nevada |
Andrew P Gordon |
Nancy J Koppe |
Contract: Other |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Contract Dispute |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on September 29, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 7 NOTICE of Corrected Image/Document re #6 Notice of Voluntary Dismissal by Plaintiff Shelby Harmer. (Service of corrected image is attached.). (Avalos, Gerardo) |
Civil Case Terminated per #6 Notice of Voluntary Dismissal with prejudice by Plaintiff Shelby Harmer. (TRW) |
Filing 6 View Corrected Image #7 as to NOTICE of Voluntary Dismissal by Plaintiff Shelby Harmer. . (Avalos, Gerardo) Modified on 9/30/2022 (EDS). |
Filing 5 CERTIFICATE of Interested Parties by Shelby Harmer. There are no known interested parties other than those participating in the case (Avalos, Gerardo) |
Filing 4 MINUTE ORDER IN CHAMBERS of the Honorable Magistrate Judge Nancy J. Koppe on 9/7/2022. Each non-governmental party is required to file a certificate of interested parties concurrently with its first appearance in a case. Fed. R. Civ. P. 7.1(b)(1); Local Rule 7.1-1(c). Plaintiff failed to file a certificate of interested parties. Accordingly, Plaintiff must file a certificate of interested parties no later than September 13, 2022. IT IS SO ORDERED.(no image attached) (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - TM) |
Filing 3 SUMMONS ISSUED as to Samsung Electronics America, Inc. re #1 Complaint. (KF) |
Filing 2 STANDING ORDER. This case has been assigned to the Honorable Andrew P. Gordon. Judge Gordon's Chambers Practices, which are posted on the U.S. District Court, District of Nevada public website, may also be accessed directly via this hyperlink: #www.nvd.uscourts.gov. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - KF) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Samsung Electronics America, Inc. (Filing fee $402 receipt number ANVDC-7036504) by Shelby Harmer. Proof of service due by 12/5/2022. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Summons) (Haines, George) NOTICE of Certificate of Interested Parties requirement: Under Local Rule 7.1-1, a party must immediately file its disclosure statement with its first appearance, pleading, petition, motion, response, or other request addressed to the court. |
Case randomly assigned to Judge Andrew P. Gordon and Magistrate Judge Nancy J. Koppe. (KF) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Nevada District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Harmer v. Samsung Electronics America, Inc. | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: Shelby Harmer | |
Represented By: | George Haines |
Represented By: | Gerardo Avalos |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: Samsung Electronics America, Inc. | |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.