Harmer v. Samsung Electronics America, Inc.
Plaintiff: Shelby Harmer
Defendant: Samsung Electronics America, Inc.
Case Number: 2:2022cv01437
Filed: September 6, 2022
Court: US District Court for the District of Nevada
Presiding Judge: Andrew P Gordon
Referring Judge: Nancy J Koppe
Nature of Suit: Contract: Other
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Contract Dispute
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on September 29, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
September 29, 2022 Filing 7 NOTICE of Corrected Image/Document re #6 Notice of Voluntary Dismissal by Plaintiff Shelby Harmer. (Service of corrected image is attached.). (Avalos, Gerardo)
September 28, 2022 Civil Case Terminated per #6 Notice of Voluntary Dismissal with prejudice by Plaintiff Shelby Harmer. (TRW)
September 28, 2022 Filing 6 View Corrected Image #7 as to NOTICE of Voluntary Dismissal by Plaintiff Shelby Harmer. . (Avalos, Gerardo) Modified on 9/30/2022 (EDS).
September 7, 2022 Filing 5 CERTIFICATE of Interested Parties by Shelby Harmer. There are no known interested parties other than those participating in the case (Avalos, Gerardo)
September 7, 2022 Filing 4 MINUTE ORDER IN CHAMBERS of the Honorable Magistrate Judge Nancy J. Koppe on 9/7/2022. Each non-governmental party is required to file a certificate of interested parties concurrently with its first appearance in a case. Fed. R. Civ. P. 7.1(b)(1); Local Rule 7.1-1(c). Plaintiff failed to file a certificate of interested parties. Accordingly, Plaintiff must file a certificate of interested parties no later than September 13, 2022. IT IS SO ORDERED.(no image attached) (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - TM)
September 6, 2022 Filing 3 SUMMONS ISSUED as to Samsung Electronics America, Inc. re #1 Complaint. (KF)
September 6, 2022 Filing 2 STANDING ORDER. This case has been assigned to the Honorable Andrew P. Gordon. Judge Gordon's Chambers Practices, which are posted on the U.S. District Court, District of Nevada public website, may also be accessed directly via this hyperlink: #www.nvd.uscourts.gov. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - KF)
September 6, 2022 Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Samsung Electronics America, Inc. (Filing fee $402 receipt number ANVDC-7036504) by Shelby Harmer. Proof of service due by 12/5/2022. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Summons) (Haines, George) NOTICE of Certificate of Interested Parties requirement: Under Local Rule 7.1-1, a party must immediately file its disclosure statement with its first appearance, pleading, petition, motion, response, or other request addressed to the court.
September 6, 2022 Case randomly assigned to Judge Andrew P. Gordon and Magistrate Judge Nancy J. Koppe. (KF)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Nevada District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Harmer v. Samsung Electronics America, Inc.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Shelby Harmer
Represented By: George Haines
Represented By: Gerardo Avalos
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Samsung Electronics America, Inc.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?