Demoss v. State of Michigan et al
| Natasha Nakisha Demoss |
| State of Michigan, Office of Governor, Department of Health and Human Service Vital Records and Office of Attorney General |
| 2:2022cv01674 |
| October 4, 2022 |
| US District Court for the District of Nevada |
| Daniel J Albregts |
| Miranda M Du |
| Habeas Corpus (General) |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on October 17, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 5 JUDGMENT. Signed by Clerk of Court Debra K. Kempi on 10/17/2022. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - DRM) |
Filing 4
ORDERED that this action is dismissed. The Clerk of Court is directed to enter judgment accordingly and close this case. The Court denies DeMoss a certificate of appealability. Signed by Chief Judge Miranda M. Du on 10/17/2022. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - DRM)
|
| Filing 3 NOTICE entitled State of Michigan; Agreement by Natasha Nakisha Demoss. (DRM) |
| Filing 2 NOTICE from USDC advising case against State of Michigan, et al., has been received and assigned case number 2:22-cv-01674. (DRM) |
| Filing 1 PETITION Declaration for Writ of Habeas Corpus, by Natasha Nakisha Demoss. (Attachments: #1 Receipt $5.00 Filing Fee PAID, #2 Civil Cover Sheet, #3 Petitioner's Mailing Address) (DRM) |
| Case randomly assigned to Chief Judge Miranda M. Du and Magistrate Judge Daniel J. Albregts. (KF) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Nevada District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
