Mikhail Education Corporation et al v. Naessens
Plaintiff: Mikhail Education Corporation and Mikhail Family Partnership
Defendant: Michael Gerard Naessens
Case Number: 2:2022cv01698
Filed: October 7, 2022
Court: US District Court for the District of Nevada
Presiding Judge: Nancy J Koppe
Referring Judge: Gloria M Navarro
Nature of Suit: Assault Libel & Slander
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 Fed. Question: Tort Action
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on October 7, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
October 7, 2022 Filing 6 SUMMONS ISSUED as to Michael Gerard Naessens re #1 Complaint. (TRW)
October 7, 2022 Filing 5 PROPOSED SUMMONS to be issued by Plaintiffs Mikhail Education Corporation, Mikhail Family Partnership. (Schweikert, Karl)
October 7, 2022 Filing 4 CLERK'S NOTICE. Attorney Action Required to ECF No. #1 -2 Proposed Summons. The summons provided does not include the attorney's name and contact information for answering. Counsel is advised to make the necessary correction and re-file the document as a Proposed Summons. (no image attached) (DRS)
October 7, 2022 Filing 3 STANDING ORDER. This case has been assigned to the Honorable Judge Gloria M. Navarro. Judge Navarro's Chambers Practices, which are posted on the U.S. District Court, District of Nevada public website, may also be accessed directly via this hyperlink #www.nvd.uscourts.gov. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - TRW)
October 7, 2022 Filing 2 CERTIFICATE of Interested Parties by MIKHAIL EDUCATION CORPORATION, Mikhail Family Partnership. There are no known interested parties other than those participating in the case. (Schweikert, Karl)
October 7, 2022 Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Michael Gerard Naessens (Filing fee $402 receipt number ANVDC-7075031) by Mikhail Family Partnership, MIKHAIL EDUCATION CORPORATION. Proof of service due by 1/5/2023. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Summons Summons) (Schweikert, Karl) NOTICE of Certificate of Interested Parties requirement: Under Local Rule 7.1-1, a party must immediately file its disclosure statement with its first appearance, pleading, petition, motion, response, or other request addressed to the court.
October 7, 2022 Case randomly assigned to Judge Gloria M. Navarro and Magistrate Judge Nancy J. Koppe. (TRW)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Nevada District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Mikhail Education Corporation et al v. Naessens
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Mikhail Education Corporation
Represented By: Karl Schweikert
Represented By: Cody S. Mounteer
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Mikhail Family Partnership
Represented By: Karl Schweikert
Represented By: Cody S. Mounteer
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Michael Gerard Naessens
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?