Houston v. Johnson et al
Matthew Travis Houston |
Calvin Johnson and Unknown Defendants |
2:2022cv01745 |
October 18, 2022 |
US District Court for the District of Nevada |
Daniel J Albregts |
Andrew P Gordon |
Habeas Corpus (General) |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on December 13, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 9 ORDER of USCA, Ninth Circuit, as to #8 Notice of Appeal filed by Matthew Travis Houston. USCA Case Number 22-16902. A briefing schedule will not be set until the court determines whether a certificate of appealability should issue. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - TRW) |
Filing 8 NOTICE OF APPEAL by Petitioner Matthew Travis Houston. Filing fee $ 505 - NOT PAID. E-mail notice (NEF) sent to the US Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. (KF) |
Filing 7 EMERGENCY DECLARATION and Financial Certificate, by Matthew Travis Houston. (KF) |
Filing 6 Judgment is entered in favor of Defendant Calvin Johnson and Unknown Defendants, and against Plaintiff Matthew Travis Houston, without Prejudice. A certificate of appealability is DENIED. Signed by Clerk of Court Debra K. Kempi on 10/25/2022. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - KF) |
Filing 5 ORDER.IT IS ORDERED that this action is DISMISSED without prejudice. A certificate of appealability is DENIED because jurists of reason would not find debatable whether the Court is correct in dismissing this action. The Clerk of the Court is directed to ENTER JUDGMENT ACCORDINGLY. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk of the Court is directed to ADD Aaron D. Ford, Attorney General of the State of Nevada, to the docket forthis case, as counsel for the Respondents (docket updated); SERVE the Respondents with a copy of the habeas petition (ECF No. 1) and acopy of this order. Respondents need take no action with respect to this case; and SEND Petitioner the forms for a petition for writ of habeas corpus under28 U.S.C. 2254, for a petition for writ of habeas corpus under 28 U.S.C. 2241,for a civil rights action under 42 U.S.C. 1983, and for an application to proceedin forma pauperis (attached within). Signed by Judge Andrew P. Gordon on 10/25/2022. (Attachments: #1 22 U.S.C. 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus, #2 28 U.S.C. 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus, #3 42 U.S.C. 1983 Complaint, #4 IFP Application - all to be provided to P through the law library)(NEF for #1 Habeas Petiton sent to AG ONLY - Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - KF) |
Filing 4 NOTICE from USDC advising case against Matthew Travis Houston, et al., has been received and assigned case number 2:22-cv-01745-APG-DJA. (HAM) |
Filing 3 Case transferred in from District of Iowa Northern; Case Number 1:22-cv-00122. Original file with transfer order and docket sheet received. |
Case randomly assigned to Judge Andrew P. Gordon and Magistrate Judge Daniel J. Albregts. (HAM) |
Filing 2 ORDER re #1 Pro Se Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus filed by Matthew Travis Houston: This case is hereby transferred to the United States District Court for the District of Nevada. Signed by Chief Judge Leonard T Strand on 10/12/2022. Case electronically transferred to District of Nevada. (copy mailed to Pltf) (jjh) [Transferred from Iowa Northern on 10/18/2022.] |
Filing 1 PRO SE PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus filed by Matthew Travis Houston. Dismissal Deadline 1/15/2023 (Attachments: #1 Exhibit) (NEF mailed to Pltf per PSLC) (jjh) [Transferred from Iowa Northern on 10/18/2022.] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Nevada District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.